Laserfiche WebLink
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment <br /> Neighborhood G <br /> Page 2 <br /> enforcement action if brought to the attentions of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions <br /> determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. <br /> • The term historical recognized environmental condition means an environmental condition which in <br /> the past would have been considered a recognized environmental condition, but which may or may <br /> not be considered a recognized environmental condition currently. <br /> The goal of this assessment is not to demonstrate that no hazardous materials are present at the Site. The <br /> assessment is necessary, however, to complete "...all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and <br /> uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice" [42 USC § 9601 (35) (B)]. <br /> The use of an environmental professional in the performance of this assessment will minimize and <br /> manage risk of environmental difficulty, but cannot completely eliminate the risk. <br /> 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK <br /> 1.2.1 ASTM E 1527-00 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment <br /> The typical scope of work for an ASTM E 1527-00 Phase I ESA is described below. The following <br /> sections summarize the scope of work that Condor performed for the Phase I ESA. An ASTM Phase II <br /> ESA was not included in this scope of work. The results of the Phase I ESA are used to determine the <br /> need for, and scope of, a Phase II ESA. <br /> 1.2.1.1 Site Reconnaissance <br /> Condor made a Site reconnaissance and prepared a general description of the Site. Observations were <br /> made on the Site, along the periphery of the Site, and in all areas common to the Site and adjacent <br /> I properties to assess if conditions suggest that hazardous substances are present on, or might migrate to, <br /> the Site. Obvious terrain characteristics of concern, such as areas of distressed vegetation, ground stains, <br /> landfills, depressions, and/or evidence of any below-grade tanks, were also noted. <br /> 1.2.1.2 Review of Site History <br /> The history of the Site was reviewed to learn about permits granted or citations issued (including any well <br /> and/or underground storage tank permits), prior uses of the Site and properties immediately adjacent to <br /> the Site, and local geologic and hydrogeologic data, as appropriate. Topographic maps and reasonably <br /> obtainable historical aerial photos were reviewed to assess historical land uses on and near the Site. <br /> Where available, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were reviewed for the Site. A Site history was obtained <br /> from topographic maps,aerial photographs, interviews, and other historical resources. <br /> 1.2.13 Review of Environmental Records <br /> The non-confidential portions of reasonably obtainable and practically reviewable records retained by <br /> Federal, State, and local agencies for properties in the vicinity of the Site within an approximate minimum <br /> search distance (MSD), that have been investigated and/or inspected, were reviewed for potential <br /> environmental liability. The records review included the following,as applicable: <br /> 1. AST-Aboveground storage tanks as provided by the State Water Resources Control Board. <br /> 2. BORDERZONE- Database provided by the Department of Health Services-Land Use and Air Assessment <br /> that identities properties within 2,000 feet of land at which hazardous waste has been deposited, creating a <br /> significant existing or potential hazard to public health and safety. <br /> 3. CALFID - California Facility Inventory Database was created within the California Environmental <br /> Protection Agency to facilitate the identification of complete environmental regulatory profiles for facilities. <br /> i a CONDOR <br />