My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005292_SSCRPT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
14400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500509
>
SU0005292_SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:22:00 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:12:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SU0005292
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500509
STREET_NUMBER
14400
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
LOCKEFORD
APN
01911026, 20, &
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14400 E HWY 88
RECEIVED_DATE
8/9/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\HWY 88\14400\PA-0500509\SU0005292\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,oF �oG SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton ■ CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420 • Fax:(209)464-0138 • Web:www.co.san-Joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> /7 - PA#: Q—'�� <br /> EM1�ON: ��r ��/ _ ��' . �ti [ /Y REPORT DATE: <br /> S = sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905,Section 9-905.12 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> �`�� [] 1.1 Description of site (report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> ❑ [ 1.2 bescliption of proposed development, <br /> j] 1.3 Parcel location map. <br /> j�,�� ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples: strut'-r�cr!'H%iPc_waI1S-F52ntIC-sVsteR1S,.large trees,__ <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways, etc.p <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES <br /> 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site tc <br /> / �� ❑ of information:current and/or previous property owners, historical <br /> applications, etc.) <br /> �c 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT S <br /> E3— ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the Y <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: DatabaE. <br /> chemical application search, site reconnaissance and survey, etc, <br /> �� / <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and b <br /> at the project site, (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/sto C <br /> septic systems, injection wells, unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons,ve <br /> stockpiled solid waste, etc.) @���2P� /�—/�� �� <br /> f ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above ad, <br /> —l1 <br /> identified at the project site (see examples above). <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above ar <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the proje <br /> landfill/former gasoline station,in area of known DBCP/Nitrate C <br /> a� ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above <br /> identified in the area of the project site. ' <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOUR <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATI X <br /> ��j.� ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamiri <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment.' <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SE <br /> �i � ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each sora >� �X:� ��✓�-� <br /> a� further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats. <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water sample � � ��, <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must it <br /> ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive (i.e.all information referenced was it <br /> other reports). <br /> ❑ 5.3—The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental-professional. <br /> ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application <br /> 8� ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. 01-1� <br /> Reviewed By: Lisa Medina Sr. R.E.H.S. Reviewed Date: <br /> EHD 26-02-001 Pagel of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.