Laserfiche WebLink
al <br /> ' MUM I IN <br /> �•. s+ _. <br /> P.O.BOX 1537 c - <br /> LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241 za <br /> Phone(209)334-3626 <br /> Cell(209)327-5519 <br /> zx <br /> RFCF!N/F_D y <br /> December 29,2005 <br /> �► 2005 <br /> ti Community Development Dept.. <br /> Kathy Allen <br /> CIO San Joaquin County Development Department <br /> Development Services Division �" .. <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton,California 95205 <br /> Regarding: <br /> Donald Luchessi,Inc. # <br /> P.O. Box I514 <br /> Lockeford,California 95237 s <br /> f . <br /> Application Numbers: <br /> PA-0500509(SU) <br /> PA-0500844(ZR) <br /> , I <br /> Dear Kathy, <br /> This letter is in reference to the applications by Baumbach and Piazza in behalf of Donald Luchessi,Inc <br /> for a zone reclassification and subdivision application for parcels 019-110-26,019-110-20,019-110-12;located at <br /> 14400 East State Route 88 and Sierra Drive,Lockeford, California. <br /> Beckman Properties is a family partnership which owns the farm property located east of the proposed <br /> "Lockeford Vistas"subdivision,parcels 019-120-04,019-120-05,019-120-26,located at 14690 East State Route <br /> 88,Lockeford,California.The Beckman family has owned this farm property for over 50 years in which time it <br /> has been used for the raising of grain crops and the grazing of cattle. It is our intent to continue with farm j <br /> operations as we have in the past with little or no interuptions from our neighbors desire to develop property. <br /> While the proposed subdivision seems a nice addition to Lockeford we do have some areas of concern which we <br /> would like the""Planning Commission"to consider. <br /> Our first concern obviously is with the preservation of our farm property as it currently is. We recommend <br /> that a noncombustible fence such as a cinder or concrete block fence be constructed between the proposed <br /> development and our property.At a height of 6 or 7 feet this fence would provide a viable deterant for entering our <br /> property, destroying of our cattle fencing, drainage of water and dumping of garbage and yard trimmings. This <br /> fencing would also enable us to better comply with fire break requirements. <br /> Our other main concern with the proposed applications for the subdivision is the lack of a park for the <br /> children in the development to enjoy. It has been our experience in other subdivisions in the area that the lack of <br /> parks generally means that our farm property becomes the target of vandalism and fires. <br />