Laserfiche WebLink
If the above figure for wastewater discharge is estimated at 90 gals/resident/day(341 liters), and using <br /> the figure of 17 g N/cap/day excreted= 17 g 341 L= 50 mg NIL/day estimated for the proposed <br /> If <br /> Since it is predicted that there will be increased water usage for the proposed project, this <br /> effect may cause a dilution of the nitrogen effluent concentration down to 50 mg N/L. Averaging 50 <br /> mg N/L and 62 mg N/L= 56 mg NIL,which will be the estimated nitrogen concentration in the <br /> effluent discharged throughout the project (excluding N reduction in the septic tank). <br /> . CALCULATED IMPACT FROM NITRATE-NITROGEN LOADING <br /> The calculated or estimated nitrate impact to the soil and ultimately to the groundwater is <br /> extremely difficult to determine due to the number of variables involved. The groundwater for this <br /> project may be the referenced sand stratum (perched water table) at 20 ft to 50 ft, or it may be the <br /> static water level of approximately 140 ft. There are various formulas and methods to estimate <br /> nitrate loading. The following calculations are based on using a conventional or traditional type of <br /> septic system consisting of a septic tank, leachlines and possible shallow sumps. Three different <br /> methods are presented, as described by each respective author/researcher, for comparison purposes <br /> and comparison with agronomic fertilizer inputs. These three methods include the Hantzsche/ <br /> Finnemore Equation, the Crites/Tchobanoglous Formula from Small and Decentralized <br /> Wastewater Management Systems and the method presented by O. B. Kaplan in Septic Systems <br /> Handbook. It is generally regarded that the Hantzche/F'innemore Equation is the most <br /> representative and accurate regarding nitrate-nitrogen loading. <br /> The primary variables involved in the assessment or in quantifying nitrate impact to the underlying <br /> groundwater are the Total Nitrogen concentrations, volume of yearly wastewater flows, extent of <br /> denitrification, and the extent of evapotranspiration. Denitrification capabilities of the indigenous <br /> silty surface and shallow subsurface soils are expected to contribute to the denitrification potential, <br /> albeit, not to the extent that a clay soil does. Ammonium retention in the clay soils that are present <br /> (14%) should also be a factor, as has been observed in other projects with similar soils. Evapo- <br /> transpiration has not been factored in any of the three nitrate loading methods; however, it will be a <br /> significant part of wastewater management and consequently nitrate-nitrogen loading. <br /> I. Hantzsche/Finn„emore Equation <br /> INW 1 - d +R Nb <br /> Nr= (I+ R) <br /> Where: <br /> Nr= Resultant average concentration of nitrate-nitrogen in recharge water-ppm NO3-N. <br /> I = Volume rate of wastewater entering the soil averaged over the gross developed area in <br /> inches per yr. Total wastewater volume: 360 gals/house x 15 houses = 5,400 gpd x 365 <br /> days/year= 1,971,000 gals- 7.47 gals per ft3 =263,502 cu ft of wastewater. <br /> Does not account for.Evapotranspiration. <br /> Page -12- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br /> s <br />