Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> s <br /> Currently, there is approximately(12 ppm (Avg.Analysis)NO3-N x 2 =24 lbs NO3-N/Ac) -�- (71 lbs <br /> NO3-N/Ac ENR) =95 lbs of NO3-N/Ac in the top five feet of the project site soils. However, <br /> during the walnut growing season, there may be 395 lbs of NO3-N/Ac - enough, and excess N to <br /> supply potential trees (300 lbs N) + (95 lbs residual N). This amounts to a theoretical excess of <br /> 145 lbs (395-250)NO3-N/Ac. Theoretically, 145 lbs excess NO3-N/Ae/yr may leach past the root <br /> zone during the growing season and that may ultimately percolate into the groundwater per year. <br /> If the project is 21 ac x 145 lbs NO3-N/Ac = 3,045 lbs NO3-N may enter the top groundwater. <br /> Converted to nitrate= 3,045 x 4.5 = 13,703 lbs of NO3. Calculated "worst-case" scenario impact: <br /> assume first aquifer mixing layer is one inch thick with a porosity of 37% and all of the excess <br /> nitrate travels to the mix layer. Wt. of groundwater under the 21 ac =914,760 ft2 x 0.0833 ft = <br /> 76,200 ft3 x:37% =28,194 ft3 x 62.4 lbs/ft3 = 1,759,306 lbs water. 13,703 lbs excess NO3 for <br /> every 6 inches of soil x (2 x 140 ft to mix layer water table) = 3.84 x 106 lbs NO3 - 1.76 x 106 lbs <br /> water= 2.2 ppm NO3 entering top mix layer every year. If the groundwater velocity is 2.3 ft/day, <br /> or 840 ft/yr, it can be estimated that the nitrate impact concentration from nitrogen fertilization <br /> could be comparable to the calculated septic system nitrate-nitrogen impact in the effluent <br /> recharge over a long period of time. <br /> III. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPACT MITIGATION ; <br /> Three separate scientific methods to assess and quantify nitrate loading were used for this Stud . <br /> The Hantzsc e _i_nnemore Equation predicts a resultant average concentration in the recharge <br /> water from the proposed Clements Oakridge Estates project to be 36.1 Dpm as-NQ,.,...The <br /> Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for nitrate in drinking water is 45 ppm as NO3. The <br /> Hantzsche/Finnemore Equation is the "industry standard" and predicts the resultant nitrate effluent <br /> recharge to be under the MCL, even when incorporating substantial safety factors into the equation. <br /> The "true" first water, or water table is unknown. As referenced in the 5JgAyJbgLc_is_a�aiguiFi=L: <br /> sand stratum from_2.1 lg , Q feet, which could act as a perched water table under certain conditions, <br /> and during specific times of the year. The Well Drillers Report does not specify when first water <br /> was encountered. The 1999 Lines of Equal Depth place the static water level at approximately 140 <br /> ft below ground surface, which is probably the true water table. <br /> There appears to be virtually no nitrate impact to the underlying aquifers that were analytically <br /> tested. It is assumed the well will be screened in these aquifers. Due to the density of surrounding <br /> on-site septic systems, and the surrounding areas upgradient to the property that are under intense <br /> agricultural production, nitrate impact may occur at some point in time in the future. However, the <br /> alkalinity of the underlying groundwater may impede nitrification. <br /> As a public well, the EHD will require periodic testing for nitrate. Additional l the EHD will <br /> require a 200-ft grout seal upon completion of the well. Given the strict EHD requirements for <br /> grout seals, this should prevent potential nitrate contamination from shallow aquifers, or perched <br /> water table conditions from entering the lower aquifers where the screened area of the well is <br /> anticipated. <br /> Page -15- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />