Laserfiche WebLink
Ii • 1, <br /> f <br /> v H <br /> VIII: CONCLUSION <br /> Based on the results of the percolation test and the soil profile, it is Dillon & <br /> Mur`phy's opinion that the existing homesite resulting from the proposed parcel split <br /> of the subject property is suited for a typical on-site sewage disposal system. The <br /> proposed system, however, should be properly designed and installed according to <br /> the"Current San Joaquin County criteria. <br /> fi <br /> Based on the depth to ground water in the area, and the size of the proposed <br /> parcel, it is our opinion that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if <br /> properly installed, should not adversely affect the quality of ground water in the <br /> area. <br /> IX, LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided <br /> regarding the proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site <br /> conditions as they existed at the time we excavated our test holes and performed <br /> the percolation tests. It was assumed that the test hole and percolation tests <br /> results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> H <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions <br /> proposed in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and <br /> practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or <br /> implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do not constitute a <br /> guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> DILLON & MURPHY <br /> Qpkp�ESSion <br /> cc <br /> No. 45277 <br /> Joe Murphy <br /> EXR9-30CC <br /> .E. <br /> �r I <br /> AF CAS/ <br /> I <br /> i <br /> 3 <br /> II 0:102511 SOILS REPORT 1003 <br />