Laserfiche WebLink
' V <br /> 12 June 2008 <br /> AGE-NC-07-1581 j <br /> Page 15 of 17 <br /> N, =The average concentration of nitrate-nitrogen in the recharged waste water parts per million <br /> of nitrate-nitrogen. <br /> I =Volume rate of wastewater entering the soil averaged over the gross developedarea(acres) <br /> in inches per year. The total wastewater volume for proposed project will be 11 gpd x 102 <br /> days of proposed operation=-1:7- <br /> ,,3-40 gallons-7.48 gallons per cubic foot='' cubic feet <br /> of wastewater. Does not accoug�'ityor evapotranspiration likely to occur. 2;35Y <br /> NW =Total nitrogen concentration of wastewater at 65 mg/L-N based on the average discharge. <br /> Accounting for the loss of mg/L-N in the septic tank at 15%: 65-15%= 55.25 and the loss <br /> from the biomat at 10%: 55.25 - 10%=49.73 mg/L-N or approximately 50 mg/L-N <br /> d = Fraction of nitrogen concentration removed from the wastewater due to denitrification <br /> within the soil (20 percent for clay type soils). <br /> R =Average rainfall rate per year: 12 inches. <br /> Nb = Background nitrate-nitrogen concentration .of rainfall recharge, from wastewater <br /> influences. <br /> Assumptions: <br /> a 3G� Z352f <br /> I= 17,340 gallons/year=2,3i-8-cubic feet wastewater/year-(3.87 acres x 43,560 feet2 12 inches) <br /> 3 3�year_14,048 = 0.165 inches/year <br /> Nw= 50 mg/L-N d=20 percent denitrification R= 12 inches/year <br /> Nb= 0.1 milligram per liter <br /> C3 N,= G. 5 inches/year(50 mg/L-N) (1-0.20) + 12 inches/year x 0.1 mg/1 <br /> (GA65-inchcs/year+ 12 inches/year) <br /> o-tdo 0.451 <br /> N,=�-8=42—.Yfr.5= 0.641 mg/L Nr=OdAl ppm nitrogen (NO3_N) <br /> Nr=13-ppm nitrate (NO3) <br /> 9.6. IMPACT OF NITROGEN LOADING FROM SITE PROJECT <br /> The Calaveras River is the most likely potential feature that could be impacted by nitrogen loading. <br /> However, the potential vertical migration of the wastewater would be greater than the potential <br /> lateral migration of over 200 feet south to the river intersection. Based on the low volume of <br /> wastewater to be generated and the significant depth to ground water,the potential vertical migration <br /> would not likely degrade the local ground water. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />