Laserfiche WebLink
{ <br /> APPLICATION OF ROBERT CHINCHIOLO, at al. <br /> BASIS FOR APPEAL ;continued) <br /> 5) The Planning Commission did not consider the <br /> recommendation of its staff that the site is physically suitable <br /> for the type of development and for the intensity of the <br /> development. <br /> 6) That the Environmental Initial Study prepared found no <br /> potentially significant environmental impacts that were <br /> detrimental to the Public health, safety or welfare -to the <br /> property or improvements of adjacent properties. <br /> 7) That there has already been one packing stied on this <br /> property since 1977, and its use is compatible with the zoning. <br /> 8) The Planning Commission ignored the economic benefits to <br /> the County, the growers and the employees of the Applicant, and <br /> the local businesses in the community. The Business Council of <br /> San Joaquin County appeared at the hearing. <br /> 9) This project was and is supported by the San Joaquin <br /> County Farm Bureau. The- Farm Bureau letter was submitted to the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> -2- <br />