My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0000027 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FAIROAKS
>
27475
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-01-08
>
SU0000027 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2019 4:14:13 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0000027
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-01-08
STREET_NUMBER
27475
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
FAIROAKS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
24811033
ENTERED_DATE
8/8/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
27475 S FAIROAKS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FAIROAKS\27475\MS-01-08\SU0000027\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rHANTZSCHEIFINNEMORE E UA TION TAKING INTO CONSIDERA TION THE <br /> NITRATE IMPACT FROM THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM A SECOND UNIT <br /> DWELLING SEPTIC SYSTEM AND THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA OF 6.5 ACRES <br /> ASA WHOLE: <br /> INS„(1 -d) +R Nb ��•� <br /> Nr= (I+R) A---,�oz <br /> Where: <br /> Nr= Resultant average concentration of nitrate-nitrogen in recharge water- (ppm NO3-N) <br /> I = Volume rate of wastewater entering the soil averaged over the gross developed area in inches per yr <br /> Nw=Total nitrogen concentration of wastewater in N mg/L(66 mg N/L/day) <br /> d = Fraction (%)of nitrate-nitrogen loss due to denitrification in the soil <br /> R = Average recharge rate of rainfall -inches per yr(13 in.) <br /> Nb= Background nitrate-nitrogen concentration of rainfall recharge,exclusive of wastewater influences(ppm NO,-N) <br /> Values and Assumptions: <br /> 68gals/person/day, x 4 people per household x-2 h _6.5 Ac x 365 d/ = 1.1 in/yr <br /> I= 43,560 cu ft/Ac ft x 7.48 gal/cu ft x '(116-12 in) <br /> Nw= 66 mg/L- 10%reduction in each o2 septics=20%reduction total =53 mg/L N <br /> %rm <br /> d = 10% from biomat formation and 25oclay soil under leachlines and observed nitrogen decrease. <br /> Nb = Assumed to be 0.1 ppm NO3-N <br /> 1.1 in/yr(53 mg N/L) 1 -0.35 + 9 in/yr x 0.1 mg/L) <br /> Nr — (1.l in//yr+ 9 in/yr) <br /> Nr =63.8 ppm as NO3-N o lr' 7.s1 ppm as NO3 <br /> Typically, the land base area of each individual project to be assessed for nitrate loading is taken as a <br /> "whole,"which is the most logical method to quantify nitrate-nitrogen loading. To explain this <br /> rationale, which closely correlates with this project, assume that a large area of land is to be carefully <br /> assessed for nitrate loading. Under this premise, each individual parcel comprising this land area <br /> would have to be individually assessed to quantify nitrogen loading. This would not be the sum total <br /> of nitrate loading from each individual parcel. Each individual land area would contribute its <br /> calculated nitrate loading in proportion to the entire land area under assessment. <br /> IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPACT MITIGATION <br /> Analyses of soil under the DeAngelis leachfield reveals apparent denitrification occurring within the <br /> soil environment in a relatively short distance. There was a decrease of 50%in nitrate-nitrogen <br /> concentration from the surface (0-24 inches) down to 5 ft which continued throughout the soil profile <br /> down to 12 ft. It can be assumed that since there was virtually no ammonia-nitrogen (NH4),which is <br /> the precursor to nitrate formation, that only the organic fraction of the total nitrogen quantified can <br /> contribute to further nitrate formation. This is going to occur only under aerobic, ideal conditions, <br /> which are normally not found within the microscopic pore spaces of clay soil. <br /> Page A 0- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.