My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0009506 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRAZIER
>
17601
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1300015
>
SU0009506 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:34:04 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:38:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0009506
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1300015
STREET_NUMBER
17601
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FRAZIER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
APN
06511006 07 08 09
ENTERED_DATE
2/5/2013 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17601 E FRAZIER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/5/2013 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FRAZIER\17601\PA-1300015\SU0009506\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ 6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings)was provided with REHS <br /> verification signature. The rate was correctly calculated using the last reading. See Appendix/-' <br /> for Test Results Form. <br /> Shallow Tests <br /> TEST HOLE PERCOLATION RATE <br /> 1 (Parcel 1) 50 min./in. <br /> 2 (Parcel 2) 50 min./in. <br /> 3 (Parcel 3) 23 min./in. <br /> 4 (Parcel 4) 23 min./in. <br /> 5 (Parcel 5) 50 min./in. <br /> 6 (Parcel 6) . (Fai <br /> — 7 (Parcel 7) 2N min./tn. <br /> 8 (Parcel 8) 21 min./in. <br /> 9 (Parcel 9) 28 min./in. <br /> 10 (Parcel 10) 31 min./in. <br /> 11 (Parcel 11) 19 min./in. <br /> 12 (Parcel 12) 31 min./in. <br /> 13 (Parcel 13) 36 min./in. <br /> 14 (Parcel 14) 21 min./in. <br /> 15 (Parcel 15) 17 min./in. <br /> 16 (Parcel 16) 17 min./in. <br /> *See Results in Appendix. <br /> 6.7 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br /> alternative septic system. Sixteen test holes were prepared. Fifteen of the sixteen holes passed the <br /> County minimum requirements. For the one hole that failed the County minimum requirement on Parcel <br /> 6, will Beed to be re-test ' or gineered system will be nee In this area, the soils are classified <br /> as Rocklin Sandy Loazn, San Joaquin Sandy Loam, and Cometa Sandy Loam. Due to this classification <br /> and percolation rate, a standard septic system similar to the one found on the other homesites would be <br /> recommended on subject parcel. <br /> ` 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br /> fields needed at the site. Based on the results of the percolation rate and the soils profile, it is <br /> Dillon& Murphy's opinion that the subject parcels are suited for a typical on-site sewage disposal <br /> ` system. The hole located on Parcel will need to be re-tested or an engineered system will be needed. <br /> Based on the depth to groundwater in the area, and the size of the proposed parcel, it is our opinion <br /> that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if property installed, should not adversely <br /> affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> `. The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br /> development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time <br /> — 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.