My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008548 SSCRPT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRAZIER
>
18600
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000279
>
SU0008548 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:33 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:38:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SU0008548
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000279
STREET_NUMBER
18600
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FRAZIER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
06515002 04
ENTERED_DATE
12/20/2010 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18600 E FRAZIER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
12/17/2010 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FRAZIER\18600\PA-1000279\SU0008548\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> , ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> �. 600 East Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/chd <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA#: I o ,O a 2 7 9 X157 <br /> SITE LOCATION: I's 600 �Tj _, ,rt L1a! Lt REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905,Section 9-905.12 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> ® El 1.2 Description of prl posed development. <br /> ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. p <br /> [4 E] 1.4 Site map showing location of all Items on parcel. (Examples:structures, drives,wells,septic systems,large trees, <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds, waterways, etc.) <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT Ab"ROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: current and/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> �] ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD records search,agricultural <br /> chemical application search,site reconnaissance and survey,etc.) ` <br /> g] ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, abovegroundlunderground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wells, unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons,vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> f stockpiled solid waste,etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site(see examples above). 2 <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Gose proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact,etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> e� ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. -2_- <br /> 5.0 <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> j further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples)and/or mitigative measures(i.e.,clean up of <br /> i surface wastes). All mmendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> E ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(i.e.all information referenced was included in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). 3 <br /> ® ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> U] ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: Y _ ��'Reviewed Date: <br /> EHD 26-01 Pagel of 2 surface&Sub Checklist <br /> �n�nnne - w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.