My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005750
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREWERT
>
920
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500726
>
SU0005750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:44 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:44:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005750
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500726
STREET_NUMBER
920
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREWERT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
APN
19126022
ENTERED_DATE
11/3/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
920 W FREWERT RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/1/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FREWERT\920\PA-0500726\SU0005750\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FREWERT\920\PA-0500726\SU0005750\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FREWERT\920\PA-0500726\SU0005750\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\F\FREWERT\920\PA-0500726\SU0005750\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Mr.Griffin <br /> October 5,2006 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> CIWMB California Environmental Quality Act Review <br /> California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) compliance is required for the establishment, expansion, <br /> or change in operation(s)of a Solid Waste Facility(SVJF)requiring the issuance or revision of a full Solid <br /> Waste Facility Permit (SWFP). <br /> Under CEQA Guidelines,CCR Section 15096,the CIWMB acting as a Responsible Agency, is required <br /> to use the environmental document (ED)prepared by the Lead Agency in the CIWMB permit approval or <br /> concurrence process. Once the ED is completed by the Lead Agency, CIWMB staff, as a Responsible <br /> Agency, must determine whether or not the evaluation of potential environmental impacts assessed in the <br /> ED is adequate for CIWMB use in the permitting process. <br /> The purpose of CIWMB staffs review of an ED, during the preparation of the document, is to help <br /> decision-makers 1)identify potential impacts from proposed projects, 2) determine whether any such <br /> impacts are significant, and 3) ascertain whether significant impacts can be mitigated to a level of <br /> insignificance in compliance with the CEQA statutes and guidelines.. In order for <br /> CIWMB staff to ascertain that the ED is adequate for our use in the permitting process, the proposed <br /> project must be described in sufficient detail and the potential environmental impacts that may result from <br /> the proposed project must be identified and evaluated clearly in the environmental assessment and offer <br /> mitigating measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects" (CEQA <br /> Guidelines,Article 6, Section 15071[e]). <br /> If the Lead Agency identifies a potential significant environmental impact but finds that the impact is less <br /> than significant or that no mitigation is available or necessary, supporting documentation and/or studies <br /> should be specifically referenced and be made available for review or included in the ED to support such <br /> analysis. <br /> CEQA Analysis and SWFP Conditions <br /> CEQA Guidelines(CCR) Section 15063(a)(1) states that: "All phases of project planning, <br /> implementation and operation must be considered in the Initial Study of the project." This consideration, <br /> when evaluating for a SWFP revision, should consider the potential environmental impacts of any <br /> changes in design and operation of the facility that were not specifically considered in the existing SWFP. <br /> When determining the adequacy of an ED for purposes of SWFP concurrence, CIWMB staff will <br /> compare the design and operation of the facility as described in the SWFP with the project as described <br /> and evaluated in the ED. <br /> The first question is: does the CEQA evaluation for potential impacts resulting from the project <br /> thoroughly assess the potential primary and secondary impacts to the environment and/or public health <br /> and safety?The second question is: does the CEQA evaluation in the ED support the conditions of the <br /> proposed permit? For instance,does the ED also assess the potential traffic,noise, dust, vector and other <br /> impacts that can be associated with a significant increase in permitted waste throughput requested in a <br /> SWFP? When this type of information is included and addressed in the ED, the CEQA process is greatly <br /> facilitated. When this type of information is not included in the project description or elsewhere in the <br /> ED, it becomes very difficult for CIWMB staff to determine the adequacy of the ED for purposes of our <br /> environmental evaluation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.