My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006456
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
18353
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600642
>
SU0006456
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 8:51:42 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:44:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006456
PE
2691
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600642
STREET_NUMBER
18353
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
209450014 15
ENTERED_DATE
3/1/2007 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18353 W GRANT LINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
2/26/2007 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GRANT LINE\18353\PA-0600642\SU0006456\IMP PLN.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Of the total number of residential lots, 130 would be Medium High Density Residential (R-MH zone) <br /> lots,and 99 Medium Density Residential (R-M zone)lots.The higher density lots would be located <br /> within the center of the proposed development(in sub-neighborhoods D2 and D3), along the west <br /> side of the 4.5-acre linear park(to be developed within and adjacent to the PG&E easement).The <br /> lower density lots would primarily be sited around the edge of the development(in sub- <br /> neighborhoods D2 and 133), and to the east of the linear park(in sub-neighborhood D4). (See <br /> Figures 2, 3, and 4 at the end of"Project Description".) <br /> The number of residential lots corresponds to the number of dwelling units that would be built in the <br /> area covered by the Tentative Map. Although the project would alter the existing configuration, <br /> location,and acreages of the R-MH and R-M zones, the number of dwelling units by zone would not <br /> be changed from what was approved by Specific Plan III for the subject property. This fact is <br /> illustrated by Table 2,which provides a breakdown of the type of residential development by zone <br /> and compares the development to what was previously approved in Specific Plan III for the subject <br /> area. It should also be noted that the density of R-M development for the proposed residential <br /> development exceeds the maximum density range specified by the Master Plan for the R-M zone. <br /> This discrepancy, however, is permitted by the Master Plan provided certain conditions are met(i.e., ) <br /> the density of R-M development is within the density range specified by the General Plan and the <br /> density of R-M development for the entire neighborhood [Neighborhood D],which includes the R-M <br /> area of the proposed development,falls within the range specified by the Master Plan).The <br /> proposed development meets these conditions. <br /> i <br /> .Table 2: Residential Development Comparison to Specific Plan III Land Use Map <br /> Proposed Project SP III—Figure 3-2 i <br /> Zone Acres Units' Density Acres Max.Units Density <br /> I <br /> R-MH 10.33 130 12.6 du/ac 9.9 130 13.1 du/ac L <br /> R-M 10.73 99 9.2 dulac 12.0 99 8.3 du/ac I <br /> Does not include optional second units. <br /> Master Plan Amendment.The Master Plan Amendment would revise the Master Plan land use � <br /> map by relocating and adjusting areas (within Specific Plan III)that are shown as Residential, <br /> Medium-High Density(R/MH), Residential, Low& Medium Density(R/L& RIM), and Open <br /> Space/Other(OS/0). The relocation/adjustment of the R/MH and R/L&R/M areas would result in <br /> a minor increase in the acreage of both the R-M and R-MH zoning districts, but no change in the ] <br /> number of R-M units and the number of R-MH units. (See discussion under Tentative Map <br /> above.) These changes would apply to a number of Master Plan figures and tables (e.g., Tables <br /> 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3; Figures 3.5, 3.8, and 4.1). (See Appendix 2.) It should be noted that the change <br /> to the Master Pian land use map (Master Plan Figure 3.5)would also amend the General Plan ' <br /> because the General Plan map is the Master Plan map (General Plan Volume ll, page XII-39). <br /> i <br /> Specific Plan Amendment. The Specific Plan Amendment would make a number of principal <br /> changes to Specific Plan III to implement the proposed development. These include: <br /> 1. Relocating and adjusting the area in Neighborhood D designated as RIM, R/MH, and OS/O <br /> (i.e., the area located north of Grant Line Road, immediately east of Prosperity Street and <br /> immediately north and south of Teixeira Avenue, and adjacent to the 75-foot wide PG&E <br /> power line easement); <br /> 2. Permitting different setback, separation, building coverage, and height requirements for new r <br /> residential development than that specified by Specific Plan III, provided the specific lot <br /> type/product design criteria for said residential development is included as part of a Special <br /> Purpose Plan; <br /> 3. Permitting second unit dwellings in the R-MH zoning district; and k <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.