SU0006253 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3 5:12 A 2 Count further acknouui Ages that fun !p -.",01 (her : .q � d Jurisdretron'>s" financial responsibilities for aelecTt Regiolzal4Roa`cr�vars} ,id�ntiltxtilie ' ]V1HviF Technical Report;shall offset aga4n'st th�, 00ununity�7veiQr's rpo�►sltto fund: 1 3 Y Ji 1 1 1 45qz^ k - othet<(ratysp©cltiohrImproyemets in�( thert'r�sd� ons as� 1 a � r��tyatispt�ib < -� _N n ' r r `k ti ,"" y 4 re mArle�rnents to the bounty as s ectfiallutaltn tic Ta ' e ham = tr .«Y� - t 1 a ,� v a 3 v1 1. .�n�.f`v'ki cy t o# et sescr� ed in the Technical deport ern gmenls"the rtttgtloh e CQtnmunt A royals D,evely er acknowl6d e thatCo � `X f y PP 'P g. "itsts response 1� ©t` implementation of:the mtgat�oct offset program as feta}1edS }i Techir��al,lZetaort= #�eysloper 't further acknowledges that<County may amend the inrtiga#ion oet prs;gram,Fri�vW6A hat the fair shire oli'tigations ashet Forel in the;Technical Report;ar�d Commutity#Lprdvals maintained: 3.5.12.A.3 The County acknowledges that when the dwellrng unit tngger pointis reached for the Grant Gine Road"traffic: :Improvementrovement described to 11�[aster,Plan Table 9 2 . " p p (segment.from the County line to 1 580 Interchange), the Community Develaper(s) shall fund this.transporiation improvement to the extent that•the component of the MHCSD's reserved account for the Other Jurisdiction Fee is insufficient to fund the Grant'Line traffic improvement' The fittiding Community Developer shall be entitled to fee credits against the Other.Junsdiction Fee, and/or lump-sum reimbursements from any benefiting Developers) pursuant.to oversizing/reimbursement agreements with the MHCSD, to be payable by the benefiting Developer(s). 3.5.12.A.4. Future County transportation improvements, not yet addressed in the Community Approvals, may be added to the TM4F. The Community Developer shall be required to pay their fair share if subsequent traffic studies-determine that the Community is contributing to the need for improvements on the yet to be addressed County transportation improvements. In addition, the fair share obligation for certain miscellaneous County roadways p g that may not yet have been established. These miscellaneous County roadways may be added to k the TIMF provided that the Community's fair share obligation is determined prior to the inclusion in the TIMF and provided that the Community is required to fund only its fair share obligation for these transportation improvements. 3.5.12.11- The County agrees that the Community and/or Community Developers shall not be subject to any moratorium or other restriction on development permits because designated transportation improvements are not started or completed prior to a trigger point, specifically identified in the Master Plan and/or applicable Specific Plan, being reached, including those defined as Regional Roadways within the MHPA, transportation improvements within "Other Jurisdictions," or other undefined transportation improvements not covered in the Community Approvals, provided that Community Developer has complied with funding l requirements as, outlined in the MHTIF, TIMF, and Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF). 3.5.12.C. The County and the Developer acknowledge that, in addition to the MHTIF and the County TIMP, the Developer must comply with the RTIF as adopted on January 7, 2006, in resolution R-06-38. Developer acknowledges that nothing in this section relieves the Developer of the responsibility to fully comply with the RTIF. W02-sF:FPD\6(48114 5.2 -3 5- i i