Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> fi EXHIBIT A <br /> Bases for Master Plan Amendment {PA-0600364} <br /> 1. The Master Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan as amended and the <br /> Public Financing Plan. <br /> This determination can be made because the proposed map and text changes are <br /> i'✓ consistent with the policies of the General Plan and because the proposed changes do <br /> not negatively affect the Public Financing Plan. <br /> With respect to map changes and text changes, the amendments are consistent with <br /> General Plan policies regarding protections against net loss of riparian or wetland <br /> habitat or values caused by development. Although approximately one acre of <br /> wetlands would be eliminated on the project site, the General Plan permits such <br /> destruction of wetlands provided the Review Authority finds that: 1) "no suitable <br /> alternative site exists for the land us,and the use is considered necessary for the <br /> public"; 2) "there is no degradation of the habitat or numbers of any rare, <br /> F1 threatened,or endangered plant, or animal species as a result of the project"; and 3) <br /> habitat of superior quality and superior or comparable quality will be created or <br /> restored to compensate for the loss". All three findings can be made in the <br /> affirmative. The rationale with respect to the first finding ("no suitable alternative <br /> site exists for the land us, and the use is considered necessary for the public') is as <br /> follows: <br /> No suitable alternative site exists for the proposed project. The project site is <br /> part of the Mountain House New Community Master Plan area and is designated <br /> for the development of approximately 4.2 residential dwelling units per acre in <br /> Mountain House Specific Plan Ill. As discussed in the environmental impact <br /> k report(110111") for Specific Plan III,there are no reasonably available and suitable <br /> alternative sites for the development contemplated in Specific Plan III, because <br /> Fialternative sites outside of Mountain House would not meet the goal of creating <br /> a distinct new community and would not be consistent with the Master Plan <br /> goals, particularly the goals of providing an adequate supply of housing for all <br /> income groups in the community and creating a financially and fiscally viable <br /> community resulting in a positive economic impact on the County. <br /> F, <br /> The proposed project is necessary to the public, because it would support the <br /> 1 implementation of Specific Plan III by providing residential development to <br /> ensure an adequate supply of housing for all income groups in the community. <br /> As discussed in the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> adopted by the County in conjunction with the certification of the Specific Plan <br /> III BIR, implementation of Specific Plan III would allow for a great deal of choice <br /> for potential residents when deciding to buy, share, or rent a home In San <br /> Joaquin County, which in turn would cause prices and rents to vary <br /> considerably and allow increased housing opportunities for a variety of income <br /> levels. (San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors Order B-05-1289 at <br /> i - attachment A, pages 34-35.) <br />' The rationale with respect to the second finding ("there is no degradation of the <br /> habitat or numbers of any rare,threatened, or endangered plant, or animal species <br /> 1 <br />