SU0006255 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

n c. 1.02 acres of wetland will be filled as a result of the project(Draft Wetland Delineation Report Golden State Investments 11, LP Property February 2006). The applicant shall replace the lost wetland with 1.02 acres of wetland (General Plan,Volume I, Policy VI, G, 5; Master Plan, Q Implementation 7.3.6 (b)). d. The Wetland Plan shall be consistent with all Federal, State, and local a regulations (Master Plan, Implementation 7.3.6(k); Specific Plan ill, Implementation Measure 7.3.4.3 (e)). e. The Wetland Plan shall show the location and extent of existing wetlands on the site of the proposed project. f. The Wetland Plan shall indicate sites that are to be developed or a preserved to serve as mitigation for loss of wetlands as a result of the proposed project. To the extent practical, mitigation sites shall be in the Mountain House Creek corridor. If replacement in the Mountain House Creek corridor is not feasible, replacement shall be within San Joaquin County. 3 g. Provisions shall be made for maintaining replacement wetland for a a minimum of five (5) years. h. Assurance of wetland preservation shall be by conservation easement or a other acceptable methods. In addition to the above,with regard to riparian habitat,the applicant will prepare a Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan for the elimination of riparian habitat on the site, pursuant to Community Development Department Condition of Approval#38 for Major Subdivision Application PA-0600363. Riparian habitat generally does not include wetlands(see Section 9-110.4 of the San Joaquin a County Development Title); however,to the extent that the elimination of any wetlands habitat on the site is compensated by the Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan,the compensation provided by the Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan would serve as mitigation for the loss of the wetlands. With respect to the Master Plan/Specific Plan III,the consistency review found that the proposed subdivision addresses the affordable housing objectives a expressed in these plans by meeting Master Plan/Specific Plan III requirements for housing diversity and affordability,and density of development(within the Minimum and Maximum density range for the R/L and the R/M land use designations for Neighborhood AIB, per Master Plan Section 3.3. To meet Master Plan/Specific Plan III requirements regarding noise,future residents of the subdivision will be protected from excessive outdoor and indoor noise levels via landscaping,wall treatments,and construction requirements for homes.To a promote greater energy efficiency and accessibility in accordance with Master Plan requirements,development of the subdivision incorporates a number of design features. With respect to the Public Financing Plan,the consistency review has determined ` the proposed subdivision is consistent with said plan because: 1)development of the subdivision will finance the pro-rata cost of infrastructure needed to serve a it,through a combination of impact fees, monthly utility charges,special taxes and MHCSD special taxes; and 2)development of the subdivision will pay the 4