SU0006255 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

County's approval of a Reserved Discretionary Approval for the Project shall be consistent with the Master Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and any Vested Elements in any applicable Development Agreement. 3.5. Count 's Good Faith in Processin . 3.5.1. Subject to compliance with CEQA,public hearings, findings and other actions involving the exercise of legislative or administrative discretion,provided that Developer is not in default under this Agreement, County agrees that it will accept, in good faith, for processing, review and action, all complete applications for Development Permits or other entitlements for use of the Property meeting the requirements of the Existing Approvals and this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and in furtherance of the parties' intent to reduce delay and duplication,the parties agree that with respect to all future discretionary Development Permits,unless the events described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 (as that Section may be amended from time to time)have occurred, and subject to the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15177,15178 and 15179 (as those Sections may be amended from time to time), no Subsequent or Supplemental Environ 'Mental Impact Report shall be required in connection with such Development Permits, and the County shall make a written finding that the Development Permit is either a Subsequent Project identified in,or a Project within the scope of the 1994 Master Plan EIR, or any later EIR which is certified in connection with the Project. Developer shall be provided with a copy of any final administrative draft CEQA document prepared in connection with any Development Permit and shall be given the opportunity to submit comments on such administrative drafts prior to any applicable public review period, and shall be given the opportunity to meet and confer with the County on the a administrative drafts of the CEQA document. 3.5.2. The County shall inform the Developer, upon Developer's written request, of the necessary submission requirements for each application for a Development Permit in advance, and shall review said application and schedule the application for review by the appropriate authority. To the extent deemed legally feasible by County, all previous environmental documents shall be relied upon in order to minimize or expedite subsequent environmental review and documentation. 3.5.3. To the extent that Developer's applications are legally complete, the County shall not deny acceptance of an application by Developer. If the County denies acceptance of an application by Developer or fails to grant approval of the application, the County, upon Developer's written request, shall advise the Developer in writing of the grounds for disapproval, which shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, and shall set forth to the extent deemed feasible by the County the actions or modifications required by the Developer to respond to the grounds for denial consistent with the provisions of this Agreement. The County shall not disapprove an application prior to providing the Developer with a reasonable opportunity to respond to the County's objections to the application.No denial of an application or denial of an approval shall preclude Developer from resubmitting an application, and to the extent legally permissible,no waiting period contained in the Ordinances or applicable Laws shall apply to resubmission and the County expressly waives the benefit of any such waiting W02-SF:FPll161481145.2 -32-