Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTS Ti NTAnVE MAP 4, <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.1 AESTHETICS <br /> 1 i <br /> b. Substantially damage scenic resources? <br /> The nearest designated scenic route identified in the County's General Plan is the 1-580 link <br /> to 1-5approximately 2 mil <br /> pp y es south of the project site. The project site would not be visible <br /> E <br /> from this designated scenic route. The site is vacant and there are no identifiable scenic <br /> resources on the property. Therefore, no impact would occur. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> No mitigation measures are required. <br /> C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character of the surrounding area? <br /> The visual character of the site consists of a vegetated watercourse,hilly terrain,a crop of <br /> y oats, a house, accessory structures and discarded debris laying about the property. <br /> Development of the site will convert the entire property into one of a landscaped residential <br /> neighborhood. Project plans call for grading that will require retaining walls up to seven feet <br /> k high along the northerly and westerly property lines, and south of lots 50 and 51. Section <br /> 4.2.8.1 of Specific Plan III discusses wall and fence requirements within the Mountain House <br /> Community. Where development abuts the Grant Line Village homesites, agricultural fences <br /> are encouraged. The Master Plan and Specific Plan III allow walls up to seven feet high. <br /> Project plans do not include design details of the retaining walls,but the applicant and/or <br /> builder will be required to comply with the Mountain House Community Design Guidelines <br /> [ relative to design,materials and color. However, walls cannot exceed 7 feet in height. <br /> Section 3.2.3.3e requires that a landscape buffer at least 8 feet wide and an agricultural fence <br /> shall be provided on properties adjacent to the Grant Line Village pre-existing residential <br /> areas in Neighborhood AIB, Project plans(Figures 2-2 and 2-5) show that an 8-foot wide 4 <br /> agriculture buffer will be located behind the wall (to the south or to the east of the retaining <br /> f walls), and an agriculture fence will separate the residential properties from the landscaped <br /> buffer. <br /> Although development of the project site will present a contrast to the existing field of oats <br /> and riparian corridor,the proposed project is consistent to what was evaluated in the SPIII <br /> EIR and does not create any new impacts. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> No mitigation measures are required. <br /> I d. Create a new source of light and glare that would affect day-or night-tune views? <br /> Figure 4.1-5 at the end of this section illustrates the street lighting plan for the proposed <br /> subdivision. The lights are sited at the end of the cul-de-sacs and intermittently placed near <br /> street intersections. Compared to existing conditions,the proposed project will create a new <br /> source of light and glare that is typical of residential communities. As the development plans <br /> are submitted for the residential project,the applicant and/or builder will be required to <br /> flit, submit preliminary lighting plans that comply with the MHCSD Design Guidelines. These <br /> 4-6 <br />