My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006105 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARLAN
>
10998
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600359
>
SU0006105 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:32:08 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:57:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0006105
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600359
STREET_NUMBER
10998
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HARLAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
FRENCH CAMP
APN
19333030
ENTERED_DATE
7/5/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10998 S HARLAN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/3/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HARLAN\10998\PA-0600359\SU0006105\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3d Floor Stockton•CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420•Fax:(209)4640138• Web:www.co.san-joaquin.caus/ehd <br /> / a <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: _ ��' �� �, ��l L�L PA li: nC—UO 3 S9/ <br /> REPORT DATE: ,E4 0 0- <br /> 0 <br /> = Immcient <br /> e <br /> I = ImvRSan Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ® ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site.,,, y- 5— <br /> © ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ir ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to / <br /> © 3 <br /> groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. /� <br /> ❑ `f <br /> 2.2 DescriptioNdiscussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. X91 Z/ <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. )O:y y 1.��..zrh•�J L.1,�, �a."Plf[Le�isc� <br /> Ur P <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> © ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate bad from these sources to the project site. & L <br /> ❑x ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. t /� <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. ry-& <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site.n <br /> © ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loadingconsideringall potential sources identified. Use of ' <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formula/model,if applicable.,V,4- 6 NL _ �i, 33 r.'V7/-Q <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells,rivers,lakes etc./7� f, —7� <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. b 6— <br /> MX ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the proiect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> Fq ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. I/foy- " <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: _ Reviewed Date: ZZZ!2[_rl f <br /> EM 26-02- 2 Page 1 of 2 Sudwe&Sub Checkli t <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.