Laserfiche WebLink
w <br /> GROUND WATER INFORMATION <br /> The water table as shown on the Lines of Equal Depth to Ground Water indicates approximately /J <br /> 35'. The water to _ en rising in the Stockton area due to the cessation of pumping from six <br /> deep wells. Th domestic ell was d and tested by Far West Labs, and tested for DBCP <br /> E and Nitrates. Th s are �repZsive <br /> 811 d DBCP<0.01.The sample log-in record is included (Z�.-2�! �{ <br /> I along with the test reports. of Smith&Associates was present for the <br /> sampling. There is no chain of custody document. The irrigation well is located on the west <br /> property line. <br /> The sample does not meet current California primary drinking water standards for Nitrate. � 1 <br /> SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION <br /> A portion of the TPM is included showing the residential parcel and the existing development ( f 1 <br /> together with the location of the two test holes. The two 6" test holes were hand augured to 42" a <br /> third 4" hole was augured to refusal at approximately T for soil profile. The soil is classified as <br /> fine sandy loam. Pits are required in this type of soil. <br /> r <br /> PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION <br /> No pit was dug. The field form dated 3119109 contains the test data and is included in this <br /> report.The two 6" diamenter test holes were sleeved with 4" PVC pipe. Two inches of small <br /> gravel weere placed in the bottom of the holes. Additional gravel was placed aaround the PVC <br /> pipe as shown on the included schematic detail. The two holes were 42" deep. The 24 hour pre- <br /> soak began on 3118/09 at 1000 hours. (12" of water placed in each hole) Both holes were dry <br /> after the 24 hour pre-soak. The 4 hour test portion began at 1000 hours on 3119109. The tests <br /> conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02. Mr. Mike Escotto SR. R.E.H.S. was present for the <br /> required readings. Visual observations of the excavated soil indicated a satisfactory profile. <br /> Summary of tests: Both shallow holes failed.No tests were made on the Remainder. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> In view of no plans to add new development,the expense of additional re-test at this time does <br /> not appear warranted. The parcel can be conditioned by the EHD to control development. <br /> The size of the parcel is 3.02 gross acres and 2.7 net. The domestic well requires a radius of 150' <br /> clear(1.6 acres), the irrigation well requires 0.8 acre clear and the two existing septic systems <br /> require an estimated 0.5 acres expansion, structures and paved area, also dirt road in back are in <br /> place.. There is not adequate room for another septic system with the present development <br /> considering clearance required from the property lines. <br /> 2. <br />