Laserfiche WebLink
~' `wW <br /> containers or discarded items by this method many years ago. To detect these types of underground <br /> artifacts is difficult even with the use of ground penetrating radar or other types of non-intrusive, <br /> subsurface analyses. The land surface did not exhibit visual indicators for buried containers such as <br /> surfacing of product residue, soil mounding or soil depressions. It is unlikely that anything would <br /> have been buried on the property since the soil is so hard and tight. It is usually only atter a <br /> contaminant plume has impacted a domestic well that buried pesticide containers, or other types of <br /> contaminants are discovered. If buried items are discovered during underground utility placement, <br /> etc., the Environmental Health Department must be contacted immediately. <br /> An electrical transformer exists directly in front of the Diamond residence. The transformer <br /> appears to be relatively new (installed within the last ten years), and therefore, unlikely to <br /> contain PCBs. If the transformer were to leak or explode, it would be the responsibility of the <br /> transformer owner to mitigate environmental contamination. <br /> Nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (NPK) fertilizers should not be a concern since the <br /> property has never been in agricultural production. <br /> PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD/DATA SOURCES <br /> In my opinion, the two most significant environmental concerns to the subject property are the <br /> sewage ponds at the Migrant Farm Labor Camp and the closed Harney Lane Landfill. As stated, <br /> odor does not appear to be a significant issue with these sewage ponds. If odors were detectable, <br /> it would most likely be in the summer months with a westerly breeze, and not in the winter <br /> months. Additionally, the ponds may be somewhat protected by the "soil cap" of the Harney <br /> Lane Landfill, so that if the wind blew in a westerly direction, there would be some measure of <br /> protection. Potential groundwater contamination under the subject property from the ponds is <br /> also unlikely, provided the ponds are not too deep. This is due to the clay content of the <br /> underlying soil and the groundwater directional flow. <br /> The Harney Land Landfill is under groundwater and surface water monitoring by the County of <br /> San Joaquin. Found in Appendix "D," is the most recent annual report (1999) provided by the <br /> Environillental Health Department, regarding the groundwater and surface water monitoring at <br /> the Landfill site. From the data and information presented, it appears that there has been no <br /> impact from landfill leachate to the underlying groundwater over the past 12 years. <br /> Additionally, the groundwater data presented in Table 1 of the County Monitoring Results, <br /> indicates the static groundwater to be approximately 120 feet below grade. The 1999 Lincs of <br /> Equal Depth to Grow7dwater map show the groundwater depth to be 135 feet. Figure 2 of the <br /> County Monitoring Report illustrates the groundwater flow to be in a southerly and easterly <br /> direction, which would be cross gradient and downgradient to the subject property. <br /> The California Code of Regulations (CCR)requires certain specifications for buildings built <br /> within 1,000 feet of a landfill. These Regulations are promulgated in Title 27, §21190. Item (g) <br /> Page -3- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />