Laserfiche WebLink
'nyxn SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3"Floor Stockton CA 95202-2708 <br /> (209)468-3420-Fax:(209)464-0138- Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/chd <br /> �If <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: PA ` - <br /> REPoRTDATE: - OL <br /> S - SuRlciau San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9.905,Section 9-905.12 <br /> I - Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels),including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> �>y z <br /> ❑� ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development. ( - a <br /> ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. r't' K , <br /> El 1A Site map stowing location of all Items on parcel. (Examples:structures,drives,wells,septic systems,large trees, <br /> pastures,pools,natural drainage courses,ponds,waterways,etc.) "rwm - A <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ❑� ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past,present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information:current and/or previous property owners,historical maps.insurance maps,previous land use <br /> applications.etc.) Vi,( e.AI)I , r C- <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground 1�� <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD records search,agricultural <br /> chemical application search,site reconnaissance and survey,etc.) <br /> 0 ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handfing/storage/use,aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems,injection wells,unsealed wells,pondsAagoons,vehidelmachine repair/painting.buried or �- <br /> stockpiled solid waste,etc.) ` <br /> ❑� ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site(see examples above). P `s'y <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination Identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfrNfommer gasoline station,in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact,etc.) 9p g <br /> ❑- ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. . <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified(in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. R -1 <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e.collection of soilmater samples)and/or mitigative measures(Le.,dean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(.e.art information referenced was included in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> ❑�❑ 5.3 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑�- ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> ❑" ❑ 5.5 The attachmentslaappendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By:�A�wr Gr 1/� _Reviewed Date: <br /> DID 2602-001 Page I of 2 surfxz&sub ce«krst <br /> 7114?003 <br />