My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011792
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HUTCHINSON
>
9851
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800021
>
SU0011792
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:35:26 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:19:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0011792
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800021
STREET_NUMBER
9851
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HUTCHINSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337-
APN
25724048, 25724049, 25724028
ENTERED_DATE
5/8/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9851 E HUTCHINSON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/8/2018 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HUTCHINSON\9851\PA-1800021\SU0011792\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HUTCHINSON\9851\PA-1800021\SU0011792\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HUTCHINSON\9851\PA-1800021\SU0011792\EHD COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
District CEQA Reference No: 207 40095 Page 2 of 2 <br /> utilizing emissions factors from CARB's EMFAC and the total number of truck trips <br /> and idle points. <br /> The results of the HRA demonstrate that the proposed project will have a less than <br /> significant health impact compared to the District's HRA thresholds. Therefore, based <br /> on this analysis, the District concluded that the District comment recommending to <br /> evaluate potential health impacts under CEQA has been addressed. <br /> 2. Based on the project related information received and on the analysis conducted by <br /> the District, the Project specific annual emissions of criteria pollutants are not <br /> expected to exceed any of the following District significance thresholds: 100 tons per <br /> year of carbon monoxide (CO), 10 tons per year of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 10 tons <br /> per year of.reactive organic gases (ROG), 27 tons per year of oxides of sulfur (SOx), <br /> 15 tons per year of particulate matter of 10 microns or less in size (PM10), or 15 tons <br /> per year of particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in size (PM2.5). Therefore, the <br /> District concludes that the Project would have a less than significant impact on air <br /> quality when compared to the above-listed annual criteria pollutant emissions <br /> significance thresholds. <br /> 3. In addition, the Project emissions are not expected to exceed 100 pounds per day of <br /> any pollutant. Therefore, the District concludes that an ambient air quality analysis is <br /> not required and the Project would have a less than significant impact on ambient air <br /> quality standards. <br /> In conclusion, the District determines that project would have no significant adverse <br /> impact on air quality. The District recommends that a copy of the District's comments be <br /> provided to the Project proponent. If you have any questions or require further <br /> information, please call Michael Corder at (559) 230-5818. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Arnaud Marjollet <br /> Director of Permit Services <br /> Brian Clements <br /> Program Manager <br /> AM me <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.