My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004151
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
29900
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-96-0002
>
SU0004151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2020 11:05:43 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 9:55:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004151
FACILITY_NAME
QX-96-0002
STREET_NUMBER
29900
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
29900 S MACARTHUR DR
RECEIVED_DATE
10/15/1996 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MACARTHUR\29900\QX-96-02\SU0004151\CRWQCB.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY <br /> An analysis of the proposed crossing and traffic control plan is summarized in the following <br /> discussion. The results are presented in the checklist question format of the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). <br /> Would the proposed project result in: <br /> a)Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? <br /> Teichert Aggregates does not intend to increase aggregate production and processing activities <br /> in association with the proposed project. Thus, the project is not expected to result in <br /> increased vehicle trips. Since the TCP does not propose to meter or delay traffic on <br /> MacArthur Drive, the project is not expected to result in increased traffic congestion. <br /> b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or <br /> incompatible uses (e.g.farm equipment)? <br /> The proposed project is not expected to result in serious safety hazards with the <br /> implementation of the proposed TCP. No changes in design features are proposed, nor are <br /> incompatible uses anticipated as a result of this project. <br /> c)Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? <br /> The proposed project would not limit emergency access or access to nearby uses. Travel on <br /> MacArthur Drive will not be affected by the relocation of the crossing. <br /> d)Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? <br /> Since there is no demand for parking in the vicinity of the proposed crossing, the issue of <br /> insufficient parking capacity is not applicable to this project. <br /> e)Hazards or barriers for pedestrians and bicyclists? <br /> The proposed project is not expected to create barriers to pedestrian and bicycle travel in the <br /> area. Due to the rural land uses in the area, the lack of usable shoulders, and the termination <br /> of MacArthur Drive three miles south of Linne Road, bicycle and pedestrian activity in the area <br /> is limited. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.