Laserfiche WebLink
i� Pwmft Almond Pmmsft <br /> N1337,1082708 <br /> e2of2 <br /> U. Analysis <br /> Toxic emissions for the proposed units were calculated using San Diego Co. emission <br /> factors for the external combustion of waste gas. In accordance with the District's Risk <br /> Management PdIcy for Permitting New and Moditd Sources(APR 1805, March 2, 2001), <br /> risks from the proposed unit's toxic emissions wero prioritized using the procedure in the <br /> 1990 CAPCOA Facility Potion Guidelines and incorporated In the District's HEART& <br /> database. The prioritization score for this proposed unit was less than 1.0 (see RMR <br /> Summary Table). No further analysis was necessary. <br /> The following parameters were used for the review. <br /> Analysis Parameters <br /> Units 7-0&8-0 <br /> ICE Usage Rate(lIlI8A9cHhr) 0.0051 ICE Usage Rab(MMSoflyr) 41.7 <br /> Flare Usage Rab(MUS011hr) 0,0051 Flare Usage Rab(MMSclyyr) 41.7 <br /> Closest Receptor(m) 644 1 Annual Hours of Operation 8,200 <br /> Ill. Conclusion <br /> The prioritization score Is less than 1.0. In accordance with the DlstrWs Risk Management <br /> Policy, the project Is approved without Toxic Best Available Control Technology (T <br /> To ensure that human health risks will not exceed District allowable levels; the permit <br /> conditions listed on page 1 of this report must be included for this proposed unit. <br /> These conclusions are based on the data provided by the applicant and the project <br /> engineer. Therefore, this analysis is valid only as long as the proposed data and <br /> parameters do not change. <br /> Attachments: <br /> A. RMR request From the project engineer <br /> B. Toxic emissions summary <br /> C. Prioritization score <br />