Laserfiche WebLink
60 v u <br /> 1. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE <br /> ASSESSMENT REPORT <br /> ASSESSOR PARCELS <br /> 173-210-04, 173-210-05,173-210-06,AND 173-210-07 <br /> STOCKTON <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY,CALIFORNIA <br /> December 10,2004 <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Bennett Development, Inc. (Client) retained Condor Earth Technologies, Inc. (Condor) to conduct an <br /> American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-00 Phase I Environmental Site <br /> Assessment (ESA) for 4860, 4768, 4708, and 4642, E. Main Street (Site) in Stockton, San Joaquin <br /> County, California (Figures 1 through 3, Appendix A). These properties are designated by Assessor <br /> Parcel Numbers (APNs) 173-210-04, 173-210-05, 173-210-06, and 173-210-07 and comprise <br /> approximately 27 acres. <br /> This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with ASTM E 1527-00, Standard Practice for <br /> Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Included is a <br /> discussion of the purpose and scope of work, a description of the Site and adjacent properties, a <br /> discussion of the information gathered from records, interviews, and Site visits,and Condor's findings and <br /> conclusions. Figures referenced in the report are included in Appendix A. The results of researched <br /> ASTM-recommended government databases (Environmental Data Resources, Inc. [EDR®] Radius Map <br /> with GeoChecV) is contained in Appendix B. Restricted Materials Permits and Pesticide Use Reports <br /> ` are contained in Appendix C. Historical topographic maps and aerial photographs are contained in <br /> Appendix D. Photographs of the Site are located in Appendix E. The completed Site Inspection <br /> Questionnaires are located in Appendix F. The glossary of terms associated with an ASTM Phase I ESA <br /> is contained in Appendix G. <br /> 1.1 PURPOSE <br /> The purpose of the ASTM Phase I ESA is to conduct an appropriate inquiry into previous ownership and <br /> uses of the property to help partially satisfy the innocent landowner defense to Comprehensive <br /> Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability and to document those <br /> conditions discovered during the inquiry that are "potential environmental conditions that could <br /> materially impact the operation of the business associated with the parcel of commercial real estate" <br /> (ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-00, Section 5.5). These potential environmental conditions are <br /> identified as recognized environmental conditions and historical recognized environmental conditions. <br /> • The term recognized environmental condition means the presence, or likely presence, of hazardous <br /> substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a <br /> past release, or a material threat of a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products into <br /> structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term <br /> is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm <br /> �• to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement <br /> action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be <br /> de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions. <br /> L <br /> ILA CONDO <br /> L <br />