Laserfiche WebLink
CvvATC <br /> J <br /> In August 2000, JPCA advanced soil boring 131, MW4, and MW5. MW4 and MW5 were <br /> completed as groundwater monitoring wells. BI was advanced to a depth of 115 feet bgs and <br /> MW4 and MW5 were installed to a depth of 75 feet bgs. Soil and groundwater samples were <br /> collected and analyzed. Site activities were summarized in JPCA's 2nd Phase 77 Environmental <br /> Assessment Report, dated October 25, 2000. <br /> In January 2003, GHH Engineering,Ino. (GHH) advanced three cone penetrometer borings and <br /> three soil borings to depths ranging from 104 feet bgs to 122 feet bgs. <br /> I <br /> In May 2003, GHH advanced MW6a, MW6b, MW7a, and MW7b to the east of the site. These <br /> borings were completed as well clusters with MW6a and MW7a advanced to a depth of <br /> approximately 75 feet bgs, and MW6b and MW7b advanced to a depth of approximately 94 feet <br /> bgs. GHH also installed EW1 in the southeast <br /> g portion of the site. Site activities were <br /> summarized in GHH's Second Quarter 2003 Groundwater Monitoring Report and Additional <br /> Assessment Report dated June 2003. <br /> In January 2004, an ATC geologist supervised the installation of five injection wells (IWI - <br /> ` IW5) associated with an ozone injection system. Each injection well has a shallow and deep <br /> spargepoint for the ozone. The shallow spargepoints were installed to a depth of approximately <br /> 74.0 feet bgs and the deep spargepoints were installed at a depth of approximately 107.7 feet bgs. <br /> From February 17 to approximately April 20, 2004, an ATC geologist supervised the installation <br /> of MW6c, MW7c, MW8, MW9a, MW9b, MW9c, MW10a, MW10b, and MW10c. The data for <br /> the well installation was submitted in an ATC's report entitled Summary Report of Subsurface <br /> Investigation and dated February 24, 2005. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING ACTIVITIES <br /> On December 13, 2004, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from MW1 through <br /> - MW5, MW6a, MW6b, MW6c, MW7a, MW7b, MW7c, MW8, MW9a, MW9b, MW9c, MW10a, <br /> MW10b, MW10c and EWl. The locations of the wells are shown on Figure 2. <br /> The depth to water was measured in all wells prior to collection of groundwater samples. The <br /> pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were then measured in the groundwater purged from <br /> the monitoring wells and recorded. Turbidity was visually observed and recorded. MW6c, <br /> MW7C, MW913 and MW10C were bailed dry before a minimum of three well casing volumes <br /> were purged. These wells were allowed to recover to the extent practical during the field <br /> activities and then sampled for chemicals of concern (COCs). A minimum of three well casing <br /> volumes were purged from each remaining groundwater monitoring well prior to sampling. <br /> After samples were collected, dissolved oxygen(DO) concentrations were measured. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Argon <br /> Laboratories Inc. (Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Cert. No. 2359) in Ceres, <br /> California for chemical analyses of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and total <br /> 5:\268231QM reportsl2004 4QR.doo 2 <br />