My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004359
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MCKINLEY
>
4343
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-01-97
>
SU0004359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:42 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:09:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004359
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
SA-01-97
STREET_NUMBER
4343
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MCKINLEY
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
APN
19302009
ENTERED_DATE
5/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4343 S MCKINLEY AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MCKINLEY\4343\SA-01-97\SU0004359\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MCKINLEY\4343\SA-01-97\SU0004359\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MCKINLEY\4343\SA-01-97\SU0004359\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MCKINLEY\4343\SA-01-97\SU0004359\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SOC Nursery Products NOEC <br /> January 30, 2002 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> process, the proposed project should be described in sufficient detail and the potential <br /> environmental impacts must be identified clearly in the environmental assessment/Initial Study <br /> Section of the ED. Mitigating measures to reduce potentially significant environmcutal impacts <br /> should be incorporated into the project, when feasible, in order to avoid potentially significant <br /> effects upon project implementation. When a potential significant environmental effect is <br /> identified and an argument is made as to why no mitigation is necessary, the discussion/analysis <br /> should be in sufficient detail that the reviewer/decision-maker can understand the lead agency's <br /> reasoning for their determination. In order to expedite document preparation and minimize <br /> redundancy - supporting documentation and/or studies would be helpful and should be <br /> incorporated by reference in the ED. <br /> ERS STAFF'S COMMENTS <br /> To assist ERS staff's analysis and evaluation of this project, and to determine the adequacy of <br /> the proposed environmental documents for IWMB concurrence purposes, we request that the <br /> following comments and questions be addressed in the document under preparation by the lead <br /> agency prior to circulation of the document. If these have already been addressed in an existing <br /> document (e.g. Report of Composting Site Information), please indicate the document, page <br /> number(s) and section(s), and provide copies to the State Clearinghouse and IWMB along with <br /> the prepared ED. <br /> Cumulative Impacts <br /> It is important that the ED identify potentially significant cumulative impacts resulting from the <br /> proposed project and any combined projects within the project vicinity as well as those <br /> incremental impacts resulting from the proposed project's implementation. <br /> Land Use Compatibility <br /> The ED should identify the proposed project site's surrounding land use. The ED should be <br /> specific regarding the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor(s). The surrounding land use <br /> must be designated as compatible with the proposed/current land use at the project site. The <br /> local government, in whose jurisdiction the facilities will be located, must make a finding that <br /> the facility is consistent with the General Plan [Public Resources Code (PRC), Section 50000] <br /> and is identified in the most recent County Integrated/Solid Waste Management Plan [PRC, <br /> Section 50001]. <br /> Proposed Site Capacity and Daily Throughput Tonnage <br /> It is very important that the ED contain all information, which will be proposed for SWFP <br /> consideration by the Board. This information would include, but not be limited to: Maximum <br /> Design Facility Capacity for the composting, processing, and storage areas; Peak Daily <br /> Throughput Volume (in tons per day) for both the organic waste fraction and the bulking agent <br /> fraction; Maximum Vehicle Throughput Volume for vehicles delivering organic/bulking <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.