|
EJ(PL.ANATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
<br /> ... -4
<br /> %ORGANIC MATTER AND ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE(ENR): Cattium Carbonate Equivalen!(ccg): Same examples.
<br /> Irl La ... Pura round caleftic limestone�calavm carbonate =100`
<br /> Rib%Organic Matter content Is determined charli bn the dried screened soil � 9
<br /> W Pure round dniomitic lime$10!c(calcium magnesium cartrenate)="09
<br /> sample. However,the total organic content may be somewhat higher than reported tssceus® S
<br /> largAr places of plant and animal residues ars screened out prior to aniaiysis. Only a part of Hye'raTed line'(CalcWth hydroxide)=135
<br /> ihe total nitrogen in the organic matterof a soil will become avallabia for.ptanf use during the Burned lime(calcium oxide)=179
<br /> growing,season. Many factors such as: soif moisture,soil iempbrafure,the soil's physical Fineness Factor !f: GaIC Eatbd as fol3nws.
<br /> condi€icn,and the arrovInt and type o(cli(asiduds present alt have an effect on'bacterial ( ? - ,..
<br /> action.Theretore,the ENRva!ue is only agutds tothe nn rogen supply available forihe growing I ('
<br /> crop.For additionalinlormaliononnitrogenreJcaseand recomme"tonguide$goo nur-book Add upthefoHrnving values;..
<br /> "Soil and Plant Analysis". „ Percent passing*40 sieve x 1.0 J
<br /> Percent passing 420 sieve minus percent passing 1140 sieve x 0.6 (t g
<br /> C t r k" Percent passing 4910 sieve&n)s percent passing 1120 sieve-x 0.3
<br /> y r Materia{that does not pass:hrough a 410 s,ove is considered to bo relatively non-effective. )}r
<br /> CONVERSIO NS:TG convert to IW&'the type of soil and tillage deptft should be considered: i- m
<br /> }lost mfnaral sups weiggh pprot lmatoly 2 mit'.`-Dn pounds(dry weight)flu'an acre-of soil Moisture Factor{con:=i 00•usTCer t moisWre In lima x u
<br /> 6112-7;ncttes;deep.Anaacre of$alt 1{I inches,deep wrr�ghs a,pprox3mata y3 m flier}pounds, z
<br /> in the pa'gi;-mast laborataries that repaiiak resuite in lbs.per acre were cons�danng 2miiiion.
<br /> lbs of soil itor acro(resuffs.in ppm x 2 Ips per ecre). However,with deepertillaga practices 1�irfmo score-,cce x fl x mfr ti
<br /> used iadaMany growers era da tllrlg with nWy 3 million lbs of self per airs. y
<br /> Common agriculiurai Time(�D-scora)m y Ox's)as 90 cce x 0.85 Il x 0.90 mf
<br /> Trio followirtable is a gandnal gu,doi no for-So flf common agrieuhural Itme wlth a Ilmascore,
<br /> ConversiprS 7pbfa: - p(i Fur atharliiti,ng matarialS,divide 7Q by the known lime scare then multiply fly the rates ri
<br /> 2 Million lbs C 3 Mil'nn s in the.table. a
<br /> Results of soil per acre' Rii of sail per sef91
<br /> •>
<br /> Sn_py3m x 6 112 7 in deep n m 3 0rin da9�i Tonsfaere a ridultural ft (70-sceare]par 6(ntlt depth t
<br /> P 2 �s ger aero nS P P x 3 - l4s per acre of F. Adapted from'Wri hods of Soil Analysis"Pari 2,ASA Pu lication, l
<br /> k s per acre of Paps x 6.9 lbs per acre of P705
<br /> using the SMP single-bullar method. r
<br /> K t' tars per acre of K K x 3 w. lbs per acre of.K_ er Iii Mineral Wil f Organtc Soil ti
<br /> StuP pH Ta pH 6.0 To pH 6.5 To PH 5.5 =r
<br /> 1"'2.4 lbs per acre of K20 x 3.6 lbs peracle of K2Q - 7.0 } none.- eons none
<br /> Mg i.'2 j- kts ger acre of Mg Mg x 3 - lbs per acre of Mg 6.S mono- _ 0.5 none
<br /> Ca w 2 lbs per acre of Ca Ca x 3 lbs per acre of Ca 6.8 0.5 1.0 none
<br /> S z 2 S': bs per acre of S S x 3j per acre of 5' 6.7 1.0 1.5 none 6 -
<br /> S x '6 Ras per aerie of SO4 5 x 9 Ped acre p(SO4 1:5 z
<br /> .8
<br /> B,Zn;Mn, B.Zn,.MQ;: 6.5 .42.0 3.0 1.5 4
<br /> Fe,Zu,Mo y- Fe,Cu;Mb.
<br /> x -2 _ Ibis per acre of B, x 3 . See per acre pf 8, 6.4 2.5 a 3.5 2-0 j
<br /> + Zn,Mn,Fe,Cu,Mo Zn,Mn,re,Ce�Mo- _ 6.3 3:0 4.0 2.5
<br /> 6.2 3.5 4.5 3.0
<br /> f 6.1 4.0 5.0 3.5
<br /> PHOSPHORUS: 1i l 6.0 � A.5 6.0 r � ._.. 4.0
<br /> 1
<br /> TWOAlfferent tests are made and reported for avaiiabiltly dt-phosphorus in the soil 5.9 5.0 6.5 4.5
<br /> sample.=The Pwand Nai-ICO.-P phosphorus resits•ara rot.'hely=nun on-all�t 9 0 Weslern._- _ .. -...S.B.,�, _ �.0 TO 4.5 �..
<br /> Labe+xidXte5 rapnns. 5.7 6.5 i 8.0 5.0 f. l
<br /> K _ 5.6 .1 = 7.0 9.0 5.5
<br /> .Weak Bray P,)jhls method determines tff&.amnuni of readily available 5.5 17.5 9.5 6.0
<br /> phosphorus in the soil, x level o1 at least 20,Wm of P IsAes rad.lor€iverdg,, damp€e it the SMP bufler3ddex read,5 91he'one would req,�'re 5.0 ionsme to raise SOIL V
<br /> a' rcrop production and a level of 30 ppfn'al P ormore Is desired for top}fields of �. _ I
<br /> (SHofar vera,sod to 6,Dora'.Btoas-rtc�o�aEsar!o65.4.51an acwouldberequ,iredtojaise
<br /> most.crops. ..." „ n "; an nrgan.c so'i!a 5 5- t.imEi cup, f+ S o,�sstnr.fldnsrdc dt a�tlme. i
<br /> . t_t
<br /> Strong Bray(Pr)--This r;4thod dmermiire Vieap°ioylrn of reavailable- _ .131118 Gtr 3 tis 6£aaC a`eve,"n tulli will oe daterminvd since lime would not beI t I
<br /> f hosphorus plus a pan of the active reserve pdgsphorus inlho soil. A l.,vef ot-al '- nsFldF'd1!or most crops.Crops ra�spa cr nq.",t.5a-'.s usua.y do^oi benefit from liming unless '
<br /> s '
<br /> least 40 ppm P and preferably 60 ppm of P or fa clo irsd for goad yields the soil pH•s, ss than 5.3
<br /> or most crops.
<br /> rf SodiurnBjearbondia(HCO,P)-Thismethgfidetairminesthe arnourtutnradiy LIMING:
<br /> _ available,phosphorysln calcareous soils,(having free lima pri Alai of at-
<br /> " yleastl Oppm P and ppreferabioy 15 ppm of P dr tnora.is desired!or good yields of Apoty late on V.2'61 e ;1'-nag,beeRta5id. Tau much li[�a can be as harmful as k'
<br /> most crops.For additlonal inlormahonari g1tcApIlbriisavailability ani!recommei`- l
<br /> dation guides see oui book'soil arid Plant Analysi tau ,isle. -! t
<br /> CATION TE)CCHANGE CAPACITY{CSC): !'
<br /> t Line must ba ihorp:g Iy nuxed wiIll the soil for maximum effectiveness,
<br /> Tha Catibn exchangge Ca acity(C`.E.C.)Is e.rneasuurs.of the c4acliy of a sp:i.to hold.
<br /> exchangeable cations.cations. Tftase Includ®Hydrogen(H•),Calcium jCw,), Mgnasram(Mg.) If bo!h magnes:w?t ann Calc um.a•a needed,apply dolorri lime to help supply
<br /> Potassiuifl(K'),And Sodium(Nai magnes um.
<br /> C.E4C.fsmaasured€niormsofmilliaquivelobts(maq,)per100gramsois ill.tidepends EXCESS LiMEM .)-
<br /> largely on Itte arnount and€y po of clay present and the orgats,e malcontent.The larger this -
<br /> value,the-more dations the soil is able to hold against leaching. p
<br /> I A visual rating of free lime present. Soils having high amounts of frog lima ova shte
<br /> PERCENTtCATION SATURATION: wihl have assoclafod problems in'he avaiiabil;,y of major and minor elements and difference
<br /> 4
<br /> TetialaTicefor thesoiiealloidrecommendedhyrno5tsoisclentisSsis651p75p9ecsni ri.�oieeoramnuninisoi dmir-dmonis.
<br /> caidum,rto to 1b,percenl mapngsfum,and from 2 fo 5 parcarft polessium_ _ ' -
<br /> Ll SOLUBLE SALTS: d t
<br /> Thaperaottcation saturation iscalculated from the C.E.C.and percent sattirationofGa, ,•
<br /> Met K,H,,and N 's reported toassistyOuindotarminingthe balanob(Acationsinyoursoil.For For infor'ra?onrei to our baok,"Sblland Plant Analysis'.
<br /> r n
<br /> r addition2l f eration see our book Soil&Plant Analysis".
<br /> 9 pH: 1a� SULFUR. v
<br />" Softp}7:The soil pHJsmeasured all aseturatedpasie.The toll PHmeasures the kEve- Al;crops need sultur-The higher the nftrogonuptake byacrop,the greater the need
<br /> soil addit or alkalinity.Mineral soils should have a pH of 6.0€o 7.d for most clops,whilst a pH , m Of ova,ea(a sulfur sltoufi3 be mainfalnad for'most crops. Fal a '
<br /> t for sulfur. A leve'of.5 20 pp
<br /> range of .5 So 6.O Is adequate for organic softs. ,
<br />! additinnai�nfarmat€nn.on sea lab;+sty u'sul`..�and making sulfur reCnmmsndailsitss sae our
<br /> Buffer Index: The buffer pH Is determined with the Shosimakei;r,McLean,and Pratt4o),;-soil and Plant Ar'alysls", k^
<br /> (SMP)bullar solution. The time requlnement is determined by the daprasslon of the:bufler pH.,� -
<br /> t by acidity in the soil sample.The amount otlimestone needed tonaorallzethe adlditypresem _
<br /> has already been dwermingd and the foliowing tabu is a genera(gaids,but var a'.unS irnm MlCRON
<br /> _. ' UTRIi:hfTS: �w
<br /> other ppublished guides may occur due to differences in limestone Iner oss,neutalizI09 value,
<br /> and Eaw i fi:". The ava"'dlileTevi oi'micronutrarts are rated from very low to very-high.However:
<br /> LIM 9w 'J s4 g
<br /> O lREI4l�NT: � r applying rho recommended ardnunt of a certain mlcronuSrient with low ratio will rttlt.
<br /> Lt+{neroquireri Japan supanlhequaSllypimescore)sal€h8limrng?netarml used.This necessarily ensure a crop response because at the many f3ctors.wta€ctt riigf influence
<br /> is a fun�tton of: - {' micronutrient rsponse. Some ofiihe factors Which influence response.are: rapidly changing
<br /> total nee irekl ng value-br crtlQum carbonate equivalent(rxa),degree of fineness or paWrie soil pH,excessive.le ing,_crop variety,and dant population, For additional Information ori
<br /> size(1)(and 4ha ronisiure fngor(con. r why plants need micronutr e;'s,[Heir availaKirry, interactions with other nutrlints,and a ,
<br /> I r&'eommendation guide see our book"Sail&Plant Analy sis'.
<br /> 'Our reports and letters are for the excf€isive and confidential use of our clients,and may not tie reproduced In whole or in T}
<br /> } .part,nor may any reference be made-to the work,title results or the eorrepany In a^y adveftlsmg:'rws release,or other public .
<br /> Announcements without obtaining out prior written auiftorizallor" Copy,ignt 1977 Revised 6196 o I
<br /> i�+,' n
<br />
|