Laserfiche WebLink
This regulation means that if a nonconforming mobile home is moved from its existing location to a new location, <br /> it will be required to meet the current setback requirements. The structures that are moved are subject to current <br /> ordinance requirements, including Development Title Section 9-1015.3 (parking regulations) and Development <br /> Title Section 9-1015.5[g] (lighting). As part of the Site Approval for the project, the Community Development <br /> Department required that guest parking spaces and security lighting be provided. <br /> The memo from the Department of Public Works has three conditions of approval, none of which require that the <br /> property conform to the elevations required for the 100-year flood plain. There is a sentence provided for <br /> information purposes which states, 'The 100-year Flood Elevation will be approximately 23 feet NGVD." This is <br /> not a condition of approval. The Department of Public Works has indicated that it is not requiring the mobile <br /> homes to be elevated above the 100-year flood level. <br /> The Lathrop-Manteca Fire District has provided a response to the appeal that states as follows: <br /> "After reviewing the appeal, I have the following comments: <br /> 1. l.feel that Fire District Condition 5 should remain for the following reasons: <br /> a. This access question is a Life-Safety issue and should remain as-is. <br /> b. These access requirements are not new. They have been in effect for many years. <br /> 2 This project is listed as an 'existing non-conforming mobile home park.' This park was abated by <br /> San Joaquin County and the State of California. Therefore, it does not exist, and if it is to be built, <br /> then it should be built as a new park and meet ALL current standards. It should also be further <br /> reviewed by all referred agencies as new construction and not'existing nonconforming'." <br /> The Mossdale Irrigation District No.2107 has provided the following response to the appeal: <br /> "In our letter of January 14, 2002, the District cited four points that the owner of the Property owner and/or <br /> Applicant should be aware of as it relates to this property. Each of those items are of importance to the District, <br /> and the Property Owner and/or Applicant should acknowledge them and be required to abide by them in <br /> connection with any future development of the property. <br /> "The District must maintain control over any improvements that are proposed for the area in and about its levees <br /> for the reason that the District is charged with the responsibility of maintaining the levees so as to protect the <br /> integrity of the levee system. If adjoining property owners are permitted to encroach within the set back <br /> requirements of the levees, the District may not be in a position of inspecting the Districts levees for possible <br /> problems in the levee and/or for making necessary repairs to the levees. <br /> "This District, like other reclamation districts, are subject to the Standards for Encroachments, as prepared and <br /> published by the Reclamation Board for the State of California. These Standards are used by Reclamation <br /> Districts and Reclamation District Engineers as a basic guide for establishing sound policies and practices in <br /> managing and maintaining levees and in connection with encroachments on or in the area of the sphere of <br /> influence of the District over its levees. <br /> "The District's levees are periodically inspected by representatives of the State for purposes of determining that <br /> the District is complying with these Standards, and the District will be cited If it does not conform to those <br /> standards." <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> SA-01-91\Certificate Investment Fund <br /> Page 4 <br /> Community Development <br />