My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006227
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
22261
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600127
>
SU0006227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 12:22:30 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006227
PE
2620
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600127
STREET_NUMBER
22261
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
22261 S MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
RECEIVED_DATE
8/28/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY\22261\PA-0600127\SU0006227\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
985
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
designations for Neighborhood A/B, per Master Plan Section 3.3. To meet Master <br /> Plan/Specific Plan III requirements regarding noise,future residents of the <br /> subdivision will be protected from excessive outdoor and indoor noise levels via <br /> landscaping wall treatments,construction requirements for homes, and by <br /> notices to residents via a note on the deed of affected properties in instances <br /> where exteriar noise levels up to an Ld„of 65 dB may be reached. To promote <br /> greater energy efficiency and accessibility in accordance with Master Plan <br /> requirements, development of the subdivision incorporates a number of design <br /> features. <br /> With respect to the Public Financing Plan, the consistency review has determined <br /> the proposed subdivision is consistent with said plan because: 1) development <br /> of the subdivision will finance the pro-rata cost of infrastructure needed to serve <br /> it,through a combination of impact fees, monthly utility charges, special taxes <br /> and MHCSD special taxes; and 2) development of the subdivision will pay the <br /> cost of mitigating impacts on existing facilities, infrastructure and the <br /> environment. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, <br /> the Master Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and any applicable Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the design or improvements of the proposed subdivision, as shown on the <br /> Tentative Mep, meets the requirements of the General Plan, Master Plan,and <br /> Specific Plan 111. The design of the proposed subdivision provides additional <br /> housing opportunities for future residents. It meets the residential density <br /> requirements of adopted plans. It incorporates a coordinated system of auto, <br /> pedestrian,and bicycle facilities that provide efficient access within the project <br /> and to commercial and public destinations(e.g., K-8 school, commercial sites). It <br /> creates a distinctive and livable residential environment within the project. <br /> Concerning design themes, the project's public facilities will be consistent with <br /> the Spanish Colonial design theme for the K-8 school that will be built in the <br /> southeastern portion of the project. In addition, all landscape, hardscape and <br /> street elements within the proposed subdivision will be designed and <br /> constructed in accordance with the adopted community approvals regarding <br /> specific theries and material variation. <br /> 3 The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the site is pt ysically suitable to accommodate the uses proposed. This analysis <br /> is based on he improvements proposed; the assessment of the hydrology and <br /> water quality of the site; and the required remediation/correction of identified <br /> hazardous materials on the site. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the area proposed for development is adequate in size to accommodate the <br /> density of drwelopment proposed, consistent with the Master Plan and Specific <br /> Plan III. <br /> 5 Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause <br /> substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.