Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Suitability Study <br /> MS-91-93 <br /> Percolation Test <br /> os .and the Remainder Parcel resulted <br /> Ainl he 2A and 2B for <br /> determinations shown on the parcel No. 1 <br /> attached Percolation rates and the <br /> "Field Note Sheets" : <br /> Parcel No . Test <br /> Hole Percolation Rate <br /> `'o • (Minutes perMinimum Usable <br /> Inch) Disposal Area <br /> 1 <br /> IA �Sauare Feet ) <br /> 1 1B 60 12 , 000 + <br /> Remainder 2A 120 12 , 000 + pits <br /> Remainder 2B 60 pits <br /> 80 12 , 000 + pits <br /> Recommendations : 12 , 000 + pits <br /> Only two of the four <br /> the San Jo 3-foot percolation <br /> Joaquin County Public Health Service, tested conformed to <br /> Division minimum requirements , <br /> into Test Due to Environmental Health <br /> Hole No . lA and the variability sloughing that occurred <br /> soil porosity test results , it does <br /> y and marginality of the <br /> the use of a subsurface <br /> not appear advisable to <br /> effluent it <br /> permit <br /> is recommended to be leaching field <br /> subsurface horizontal discharged, <br /> solely and <br /> depth of leach field wed' in combination with a <br /> 25 feet . The sewage + into seepage <br /> square feet ge system recommended Pits at a maximum <br /> minimum usable disposal is a minimum 12 <br /> Well Water area plus pits in ' 000 <br /> Anal addition. <br /> sis : <br /> Water was obtained <br /> the northeast from an existing well at the homesite <br /> Dibromochloro Parcel and tested at <br /> Dibrochloropane Pane (DBCP) and for the <br /> limit h 0 . 01 (DBCP) was not detected �'itrate r <br /> within ug/l . The test at °r above the (ctio <br /> the tolerance result for the nitrate detection <br /> Performed b °f 45 mg/1 . The ate sample was well <br /> dated y FGL Environmental well water anal <br /> August 14 and is shown on the analysis was <br /> necessary , 1991 . No special nitrate attached <br /> y for any proposed wells . °r DBCP requirements <br /> quirements are <br /> Engineer ' s Statement : <br /> is not expected systems can be installed to the density <br /> expected impact c <br /> to t <br /> hazards , groundwater y Proposed and it <br /> nor cause other health <br /> Attachments : Walter <br /> Field Note E. Curtis <br /> Sheets ( 2) Civil Engineer <br /> Parcel Map ( 1 ) <br /> Well Water Analysis ( 1 ) <br /> David and Barbara Dodson <br /> 4 <br />