Laserfiche WebLink
accessible an&had to be removed at taxpayer expense. Locations for <br /> o upstream <br /> traps were not <br /> then identified. <br /> . p am sediment a <br /> P nilfed. The Ale roe �s well <br /> and their available property on which t Alegre <br /> and stockpile material se of road access <br /> It was difficult at that time to obtain the necessary permits for dredging.ging. That <br /> difficulty had now been somewhat reduced by a Corps Long Term Management Strategy j <br /> (LTMS)process which first facilitated the permitting process in the San Francisco Bay. <br /> The Corps is now completing a similar facilitation process in the Delta. The County <br /> could benefit by proposing the Alegre site for a demonstration of this facilitated process <br /> if Alegre would commit to utilizing such a permit and RD 2075 would endorse the effort. <br /> Mr. Alegre will write to you to propose that extension. <br /> I <br /> The rest of this letter is to put on record the protest that we would want to make if <br /> the permit to excavate were reinstated. <br /> I <br /> The following bullets summarize objections to the quarry operation. <br /> • The shape of this property is such that the distance that the river flows around the <br /> north east end of the property is very much longer than the distance across the <br /> quarry area. <br /> • The river is prevented by a wing levee from flowing across the neck of the <br /> property. <br /> • If the wing levee ever fails by overtopping or by rodent holes or other causes,the <br /> neck would wash out and the present river channel would fill with silt, and <br /> San Joaquin River Water Users agricultural,diversion pumps could not operate. <br /> • As the land level has been lowered by quarrying over the last 20 years, the <br /> potential for a wash out has been increased. <br /> • If the river changes course across the neck it will flow directly toward the <br /> downstream RD 2075 levee on the right bank with great force in an area where <br /> the river bank has already eroded too close to the levee. If that levee failed it <br /> would flood RD 2075,RD 2094, RD 2096, and lands east of those Reclamation <br /> Districts. <br /> • The wing levee has never been tested at the flood stage that will occur after the <br /> design inadequacies in South Delta levees are corrected so that the Design Flood <br /> flow of 52,000 cfs at Vernalis is conveyed to the central Delta without broken <br /> levees. <br /> I <br /> The SDWA's flood conveyance plan includes this improvement in South Delta 4 <br /> levees. It also proposes that the river no longer be allowed to change course. San t <br /> Joaquin County has endorsed that plan, and DWR flood planners are being urged <br /> to adopt it. <br /> The Alegre land slopes down to the summer river level on the north east end of <br /> the property. As the quarry level has been reduced the river end of the property <br /> has been eroded and the river has become wider and shallower than it was 20 <br /> years ago. ,The direction of flow is also altered to impact the right bank of the T� <br /> 2 <br />