SU0004362 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Appeal of Staff Action from Bili and Ruth Brown 3 Attachment to Application-Appeal of Staff Action(Leanne Mueller,Associate Planner) Planning Application PA-02-12 of Daniel Mills-Approved Februray 21,2002 Apn:017-14042;20350 N.Kennifick,Acampo,Ca.95220 months is simply extending already delayed enforcement and compliance on the site. It is requested that the entire code enforcement file on this address be made available to the Planning Commission and be made part of the record of this appeal so that the complete history of non-compliance can be known and considered as part of the appeal. In particular please note the letter from Bob Zipf, Senior Building Inspector, dated April 17, 2001. That letter notes numerous corrective measures needed and responses to concerns which were raised, yet little process has been made in that regard. As an existing use, there is no need for 18 months to correct some of the balant violations, such as the fencing and trash. What is of greater concern are the Conditions which are lacking. There are no conditions to address noise. Noise has been identified as an issue and concern, but it has not been addressed. A full noise study is needed before any consideration is given to this operation and expansion. There should be a provision to limit or eliminate the outside.loudspeaker. There are operations that are occurring outside which generate noise and that cannot be controlled with Condition d. What is included within the definition of industrial activities? Is and blasting and painting within the definition? Those are clearly marked on the plan as occurring outside of buildings. There is no clear plan in place to stop the unnecessary truck horn honking for access to the premises. The Applicants are not good _ neighbors, and as soon as the County approves, they will return to prior acts of nuisance. The size and type of business in operation should be relocated to an industrial zone which is better suited to deal with the io problems and issues - that are inherent with manufacturing. List of Condition(s) and/or Findings being appealed with the reasons for removal or modification are as follows,the Condition as approved is set forth in full: 1. C0104UNII'fY DEMMUNDEPARTMMff Qwfto ts: a. RdPROVENW.NT PLAN:Submit an"Improvement Plan". The Improvement Plan mast be prepared by a regtstcred civil engineer or licensed architect. This Plan must show drainage,driveway access details (including lel on-site pi& hndscapin& sip4 existing and proposed qty services, and grading (refer to the "SITE PLAN CHECK LIST" for details). A *e is required for the Site Plan review. (Development Title Section 9484) - OBJECTION: There is so way for aelghbaes to !tare nenalftM imput oa say suclk "hopraovemeat Plea'. This is merely a place of paper which has a moth chasm of bele=honored as the truest U76-71. b. APPROVED USE:This approval is a Site Approval to allow the Custom Agricultural Mang use type at an existing facility. The Custom Agricukural Manufacturing use type includes the manufechuW and repair of customized We ultwil equipment where such equipment is primarily used to support the agricultural economy. Customized agricultural equipment includes specialty agricultural equipment which is not commonly available to formers an the retail market. This approval is also for an cgwstoa of a previously approved fort machinery repw busimeaa as shown on the revised Site Plan dated February S,2002. The proposed use will be located an 2.54 acres of a 10-aQa parcel.(Use Types:Custom Agricultural Manubduring and Equipxactut Sales end Repair;Farm Machinery Repair