Laserfiche WebLink
PC: 3-18-93 <br /> SA-92-41 <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> On September 7, 1993, Enforcement File No. EN-92-157 was opened due to the operation of a grading <br /> excavation on this site without a permit. Repeated attempts to contact the owners were unsuccessful until <br /> a letter was hand delivered to the owner's attorney, Stan Wise, on November 26, 1991. A final notice was <br /> sent to the owners on December 20, 1991. On February 20, 1992, B. Demar Hooper, representing the <br /> owners,told the Enforcement Section that a Site Approval application for fish ponds would be filed shortly. <br /> On July 2, 1992, the owner submitted Site Approval Application No. SA-92-41 for the creation of the fish <br /> ponds. On January 20, 1993, this application was approved. On February 1, 1993, B. Demar Hooper of <br /> Hackard and Taylor, representing Joe Hardesty, filed an appeal of Development Services Conditions 1(c) <br /> and 1(1) and Department of Fish and Game Conditions 4(a) and 4(b). <br /> Development Services Condition 1(c): <br /> 1.c. The applicant shall submit a copy of the approved permit or letter waiving the requirement from <br /> the Water Quality Control Board prior to the start of any on-site grading. <br /> Appeal Statement: <br /> In his appeal, the applicant argues that this project is exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit <br /> from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB): <br /> 'Mr. Hardesty's proposed project is not subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. <br /> Under 33 CFR Section 3232.4(a)(3), any discharge of dredged or fill material that may result from the <br /> construction or maintenance of farm or stock ponds is exempt from the requirement of obtaining a 404 <br /> Permit. <br /> 'Staff has not presented evidence to justify why Mr. Hardesty must obtain Water Quality Certification or <br /> waiver when he is not required by Federal law to do so. We request that this condition be eliminated.' <br /> Response to Appeal Statement: <br /> The RWQCB maintains jurisdiction over discharges into'waters of the Slate,'which can include all rivers, <br /> creeks, streams, and canals (Rivedront Development Permit Handbook, Office of Planning and Research). <br /> While this project may be exempt from a 404 permit as a result of construction or maintenance activities, <br /> RWQCB has indicated that the project is not exempt from a Federal National Pollutant Discharge <br /> Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for ongoing operations that may result in discharge into State waters. <br /> During storms, the ponds may discharge into the tributary. If RWQCB finds that this project is exempt <br /> from any permit requirements relating to water quality, this condition will be satisfied. It should be noted <br /> that Public Health Services Condition No. 3(a) also requires approval from RWQCB. <br /> -14- <br />