Laserfiche WebLink
10� 'tri nkl e and Eloy, Ash Flying ng Service. San Joaquin County <br /> E h.i s facility has 4:eE>rr utilized b.y three aerial applicator, businesses over <br /> the Fast 40 years.. The current operators acquired the facility from their <br /> parents and implemented changes in rinse water disposal practices. One <br /> chanoe, made a few months before our inspection, was to install a sump. a <br /> suturiersible" pump.: anti. an above-around tank for rinse water. Prior disposal <br /> wa:_- onto a paved area (part of which had numerous cracks) or into a small <br /> pit, f raw where it probanly infiltrated. <br /> 'Fhc--- first sarrij inl site selected was a gravel area adjacent to the runway <br />.� at the end where t"tie wash area is located. The sampling site was approxi- <br /> mately 5D "Feet- from the old pit in the wash area; the separating area is <br /> oaved with asphalt- At approximately 8 inches depth, an underlying fill of <br /> large gravel was encountered. The large gravel was discolored and had a <br /> ;pesticide/hydrocarbon odor. Free water was encountered at 18 inches. <br /> >amples of the discolored gravel and of the water were collected. <br /> soil composite samples were taken from areas adjacent to other portions <br /> Or the runway. tone composite was from 1"-6" at five sites (surface debris <br /> was removed prior to sampling) , and the other sample was from 18-24" at two <br /> it.es . A water sample was collected from a faucet supplied by an on-site <br /> well . <br /> Analyses re;�r��,' � -i t.ha.t: the gravel contained several pesticides at fairly <br />` hiq_ h levels, including UDE at 22 ppm, DDD at 15 ppm, disulfoton (Di-Syston) <br /> at ?_50 ppm, and c�arbofuran at 38 ppm. The tree-water sample also contained <br /> rUmercus pesticides, but generally at low levels. Carbofuran, however, was <br />•• a'. 16 pprrn. s,i l composite contained seven pesticides includ#ng <br /> eth i on at. IDD D 1-orn and ethyl parathion at 48 ppm- The 18"-24" soil com- <br /> posite snowed only one pesticide, 2,4-D at 0.16 ppm. No pesticides were <br /> detected in the well water sample. <br /> it is pos:c�ible t..hai:. the discolored gravel 'is part of an old leach field to <br /> disperse water from the pit in the wash area. In any event, some miti- <br /> csation will be necessary to prevent the off-site movement of pesticides in <br /> the shallow ground water. Some mitigation may also be necessary in areas <br /> where surface soils have significant. 'pesticide residues, but additional <br /> ampling is necessary to define the areas, and a review of site soils and <br /> hydrogeology is nec..essary to determine the degree of protection afforded by <br /> site specific conditions. <br /> Y <br />