Laserfiche WebLink
The Table 1 data indicate that processing area noise levels are anticipated to satisfy the project <br /> standards of significance at the nearest residences during daytime hours, except at N5, even with <br /> all processing area equipment operating concurrently. However, the Table 1 data also indicates <br /> that processing area equipment noise could exceed the nighttime standards at some locations with _ <br /> various combinations of processing equipment operating. Without mitigation,this would constitute <br /> a significant noise impact. Specific noise mitigation measures for processing area equipment are <br /> provided in a subsequent section of this report. — <br /> Mining Noise <br /> The mining areas are broken into three distinct regions of the site, as illustrated in Figure 2-7 of the <br /> ADEIR (Mining Activities Concept Plan). Equipment to be used in the mining operations will _ <br /> depend on whether the mining is conducted wet or dry. Regardless, the worst case noise <br /> generation associated with mining operations would occur during initial excavation prior to the <br /> equipment being depressed within the pits. Because wet pit mining would only occur once a — <br /> substantial depth has been reached in the pit,such equipment would be substantially shielded from <br /> view of existing residences by the pit walls. As a result, this analysis of noise impacts focuses on <br /> dry pit mining equipment operating at existing grades. <br /> The noise generation of the dry pit mining equipment and the duration of an hour these sources _ <br /> are likely to operate is provided in Table 3.J-6 of the ADEIR. It should be noted that the combined <br /> noise levels associated with the various types of mining equipment reported in Table 3.J-6 of the <br /> ADEIR equate to an average level of 89 dB Leq at a reference distance of 50 feet. BAC noise level <br /> data for similar sized mining activities (Teichert Vernalis BAC #2005-500, RMC Moosios Quarry <br /> BAC #2005-521, Teichert Marysville BAC #2005-600), indicate that mining activities typically <br /> generate noise levels ranging from 75-80 dB Leq at a reference distance of 50 feet. Given the <br /> comparatively small size of this proposed mining project, BAC believes that an average level of 80 <br /> dB Leq at 50 feet would more closely represent the noise generation of this portion of the project, _ <br /> rather than the ADEIR level of 89 dB Leq. <br /> BAC computed the noise from the mining equipment at the nearest residences using a combined — <br /> mining equipment reference level of 80 dB Leq at 50 feet with the industry-standard approach of <br /> assuming a 6 dB decrease in noise for each doubling of distance from the noise source, with an <br /> additional offset of -1.5 dB per thousand feet to account for atmospheric and excess ground — <br /> attenuation. In addition, a -5 dB offset was applied to the mining levels to account for shielding <br /> provided by the proposed berms (10 feet) and existing canal embankment (15 feet). Following _ <br /> removal of overburden, the shielding provided by these barriers will be even greater. <br /> The results of the BAC computations for the mining areas are provided in Table 2, along with the — <br /> applicable Leq noise standards. It should be noted that the Table 2 data are based on worst-case <br /> distances between mining sources and receivers, irrespective of whether the equipment is in the <br /> north or south pits, and of stage. — <br /> Page -4- <br />