Laserfiche WebLink
3.Response to Comments <br /> 1_ <br /> Impacts in San Joaquin County(SJMSCP Covered)—590 acres <br /> The SJMSCP was developed in coordination with regulatory agencies, including DFG and <br /> USFWS,to comprehensively conserve open space and wildlife habitat in balance with economic <br /> and growth interests. By complying with the SJMSCP (first component),the Project Proponent <br /> agrees to implement the conservation measures specified in the SJMSCP for impacts to covered <br /> species,which include minimization and avoidance measures such as pre-construction surveys <br /> and applied buffer zones(SJMSCP §5.2.4.25). Compliance with the SJMSCP applies to all <br /> Phases of the Project within San Joaquin County. Measures to mitigate direct impacts (i.e.,up to <br /> �e 590 acres of habitat being unavailable for up to 60 years) include the following(SJMSCP §5.3.1): <br /> A. Pay the appropriate fee as specified per phase (SJMSCP §7.4.1 and 7.4.1.3); or <br /> B. Dedicate,as conservation easements or fee title,habitat lands(in-lieu dedications)as <br /> specified per phase (SJMSCP §5.3.2.1 and 5.3.2.2);or <br /> ` C. Purchase approved mitigation bank credits as specified per phase (SJMSCP §5.3.2.4); <br /> [or] <br /> D. Propose an alternative mitigation plan,consistent with the goals of the SJMSCP and <br /> equivalent in biological value to options 1-3,above, subject to approval by the JPA with the <br /> concurrence of the Permitting Agencies' representatives on the TAC (SJMSCP, 2000). Given that <br /> ` the mined areas will be mined and subsequently reclaimed in phases,and that the reclaimed use <br /> will be agriculture (as currently exists on site),an alternative method of conservation(e.g.the <br /> placement of conservation easements on the reclaimed land with habitat protections consistent <br /> V with the conservation goals set forth in the SJMSCP)may be feasible and appropriate. <br /> Compliance with the SJMSCP reduces impacts to San Joaquin kit fox to a less-than-significant <br /> 6„ level for all Phases of the Project.While dates for implementing some mitigation have not been <br /> specified(including pre-construction surveys),compliance with the SJMSCP shall occur for each <br /> phase of the Project prior to implementation of any given Phase. This includes protocol surveys <br /> 64 for San Joaquin kit fox and compensation for loss of habitat,if any,prior to a Phase being <br /> authorized for ground disturbance. Compensation for habitat loss may be in the form of fee <br /> payment(to be used for purchase of habitat per the SJMSCP),replacement habitat lands, <br /> mitigation bank credits,or an approved mitigation plan, as noted above. The method of habitat <br /> compensation is not specified in mitigation measure 4.9.2a,but is left up to the Project Proponent <br /> to decide what is most feasible. <br /> r <br /> Impacts in Stanislaus County (Non-SJMSCP Covered)—98 acres <br /> The DEIR mitigation measure 4.9.2a also includes a second mitigation component(4.9.2a-II, III, <br /> IV)which addresses mitigation not within San Joaquin County. For Phases within Stanislaus <br /> County there are several measures that the Project Proponent must implement,which are very <br /> similar to those in the SJMSCP. For these Phases not participating in the SJMSCP(either because <br /> they are outside of San Joaquin County or because the applicant has not sought coverage under <br /> the SJMSCP),the mitigation measures include: <br /> LGema[Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 3-29 ESA/203015 <br /> Final Emirmniental Impact Report June 2009 <br /> L <br />