Laserfiche WebLink
Analysis <br /> Back round <br /> r On September 4, 1997,the Planning Commission certified Environmental Impact Report No. ER—96-3 and <br /> approved Quarry Excavation hQ• QX� f material over a 56-year period. <br /> t due o t affic re a ed i-1 to remove 0ssues.tons oThe Board of Supervisors upheld <br /> This action was appealed by t pp roved aone- ear Time Extension on April <br /> the appeal on October 30, 1997. The Planning Commission app Y <br /> { 15, 1899. <br /> On July 11, 2000, the Board of Supervisors approved Resolution No. R-00-353 for a Revisions <br /> No. 1�u.(Wowed <br /> Actions application to modify Community Development Department Conditions of App <br /> referred to as 1.v.), regarding the pond levels and the relocation of the sedimen��i a! Nonds tonowreferr de <br /> of the project site during Phase 1. The application also added Condition of App Y. ( <br /> to as 1.z.)regarding the design of the proposed sedimentation pond dike• y <br /> i <br /> Land Use <br /> I property <br /> Koster Road borders the quarry oa�K 9{E�Road�ris a single-family residencet To the north ah is iland, and ded west is to e <br /> southeast, on the opposite side <br /> agricultural land, and to the southwest,on the opposite side of the California Aqueduct, are two single-family <br /> 4 residences. <br /> i <br /> Hours ofOperation <br /> The <br /> The applicants are proposing to change the hours <br /> of 6peration originally approved in hours of approved area 96 1. a.m. to <br /> currently operates from 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. proposed <br /> ' operating during the proposed hours,their electricity costs are . <br /> 5:34 p.m. The applicants state that by o <br /> reduced as well as the likelihood of rolling blackouts.e Qua rypExcav aeon peRwl would modify Conditions of <br /> Approval No. 1.g. and would add Condition 1 <br /> Bollard & Brennan, Inc. prepared an environmental noise assessment to determine whether the <br /> rescheduling of the quarry's hours of operation would adversely affect the existing residences in the <br /> project vicinity. <br /> The study concluded that, with the mitigaprn nglnighttimeion measu res istd below, noise impacts could mining and processing operations:e reduced o a <br /> less than significant level during early <br /> Aggregate stockpile locations should be maintained at their current positions, as those stockpiles <br /> ing area noise to the nearest residences located to the east and <br /> provide partial shielding of process <br /> south. <br /> Early morning/nighttime mining activities within 600 feet of any residence should not occur unless <br /> ' equipment is recessed at least 40 feet within the pit so as to be substantially shielded from that <br /> 4 <br /> I E residence. <br /> residences for <br /> ch <br /> i <br /> Overburden removal or initial mining activities <br /> in swithin 600i should be lmited othe <br /> the hou s#om 5'00 a.m to 5130 <br /> the mining equipment is not reces p <br /> p.m. <br /> I <br /> QX-96-11DSS Company <br /> San Joaquin County Page 3 <br /> Community Development <br /> I <br /> 1, <br />