Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> `r � KLEIIVFELDER <br /> I <br /> the embankment construction, our experience in our laboratory indicates that with minimal <br />' effort, above 85 percent compaction can be easily obtained. <br />{ For our slope stability analysis, we have used the same native soil properties as used in our 1997 <br />} report for the cemented clay, sand, and gravel and for the silty sandy clay. These strength <br />' parameters are also described on the attached cross-sections, Plates 1 and 2. <br /> The stability analysis was performed using the computer program SLOPE/W. SLOPE/W uses <br /> the limit equilibrium theory to compute the factor of safety of earth and rock slopes.using several. <br /> methods. In our previous evaluations for Brown, Granite, and Teichert facilities, we noted that <br /> the Bishop's Simplified method generally produced the lowest, or most conservative, factors of <br /> safety. For this reason, we have used the Bishop's method for our analysis. <br /> Computed factors of safety for the configuration and soil properties analyzed are presented on <br /> the attached Plates 1 and 2. We can furnish the actual'computer printout sheets if needed. As <br /> noted, the factors of.safety varied from 1.73 for static conditions to a lower value. of 1.32 <br /> associated with a seismic event of 0.15G. These values comply with Title Section '9= <br /> f 1415.3(K)(4): <br /> Two other issues were discussed at our recent meeting with San Joaquin,County. The first dealt <br /> with the fact that several of the excavated slopes would have water against the slopes. A <br /> concern was raised whether the native soils could become saturated which might reduce the soil <br /> strength properties used in our analysis. Recently our firm drilled monitoring wells at the bottom <br /> of the existing Teichert pit in Tracy. Even though both monitoring wells were placed within <br /> approximately 10 feet from the edge of the existing pond, groundwater was actually measured in <br /> the wells approximately 13 feet below the adjacent pond level. In other words, due to the <br /> generally cemented nature of.the sandy and gravelly soils in this area combined with the scaling <br /> effect of the silt and clay materials washed into the settling ponds, there is an actual hydraulic <br /> separation between the groundwater and the water level in the pond. For this reason, we do not <br /> anticipate any significant effect of water ponding next to the excavated slopes. In addition, we <br /> I believe we have also used conservative strength properties for these underlying cemented <br /> materials based on back calculations of existing slopes and actual laboratory tests on block <br /> samples. <br /> The last issue raised was in regards to the number of shallow monitoring wells between the <br /> l aqueduct and the proposed settling pond. References is made to our letter dated September 4, <br /> 1997 regarding monitoring well installation. At that time we.proposed one shallow monitoring <br /> well between the Delta-Mendota aqueduct and the pond. These are relatively shallow <br /> monitoring wells, and we understand that San Joaquin County wou prefer that there_e�two <br /> f wells. Since the cost should be minimal, we suggest that two shallow wells be installed. <br /> i <br /> 20-2245-50.G50/2000L219 Page 2 of 3 <br /> Copyright 2000 Kleinfelder,Inc. March 13,2000 <br />