Laserfiche WebLink
•�:y� <br /> 33u � .....,.-b`Ws«' <br /> Level of Significance Level of Significance <br /> Environmental Impact Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures After Mitigation <br /> LS S LS SU <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.2-3b(A-1,A-2&A-3) <br /> y _ Annual inspection by the County of the completed reclamation areas shall specifically evaluate the <br /> effectiveness of vegetative cover in preventing erosion, The inspections shall identify areas of <br /> reclaimed slopes on which significant soil surface is bare of vegetation or where rill or gully formations <br /> are occurring,and any areas of significant soil slides or other disruptions of the final slope surface. <br /> The proponent shall be notified of any identified problems and required to remediate these areas prior <br /> to the next annual inspection,or immediately,if deemed necessary by the County inspection. If an <br /> erosion or revegetation problem is identified in the same area for two consecutive years,the <br /> proponent shall submit,for approval by Development Services Division,a revised reclamation plan <br /> which provides for reduced slope steepness or alternative measures for controlling identified <br /> problems. if reduction of slope steepness is required,the proponent shall identify the source of any <br /> necessary fill materials and amend the Financial Assurances for the project to address any necessary <br /> financing to place the fill, <br /> N <br /> Impact 4.2-4 A-4 A-1,A-2& Mitigation Measure 4.2-4a(A-1,A-2&A-3) All Alts. <br /> Capacity of Proposed Processing A-3 <br /> Basins may be Inadequate Prior to commencement of mining-at the project site, the proponent shall submit for approval by the <br /> Development Services Division,calculations and engineering drawings prepared by a licensed <br /> engineer that demonstrate that the proposed processing wastewater basins are capable of storing <br /> expected wastewater discharge and precipitation. <br /> Impact 4.2-5 Alt Alts. None required <br /> Decreased Availability of Aggregate <br /> Resources <br /> Impact 4.2-6.,-.,, ^. _ A-4 A-1,A-2& Mitigation Measure 4.2-6a(A-1,A-2&A-3) All Alts. <br /> Elevated Levels Could A-3 <br /> Affect Post-FleclamationAgricutture The maximum depth of mining shall be a minimum of six feet above the seasonal high water level. As <br /> a basis for initial and ongoing mining depths,the proponent shall submit annually the results of <br /> quarterly monitoring reports to the Department Services Division which document the groundwater <br /> elevations for a minimum of ten water supply wells around the general perimeter of the permitted <br /> mining area. In the event that the proponent is unable to obtain or retain measurements from at least <br /> ten existing water wells, the proponent shall procure new wells for monitoring purposes at locations <br /> acceptable to the Development Services Division, The proponent shall provide a verifiable bench <br /> mark at each well site that can be referenced for compliance monitoring. Based on the water depth <br /> monitoring reports,Development Services Division may recalculate the expected high groundwater <br /> elevation, thereby adjusting the maximum depth of mining. <br /> LS=less than significant A-1 =Proposed Project <br /> S=significant A-2=Proposed Project with Alternate Northern Access Road <br /> SU=significant and unavoidable A-3=Proposed Project with Alternate Southern Access Road to New Interchange <br /> A-4=No Project <br />