Laserfiche WebLink
The Table 3 data indicate that,due to the setbacks from the project boundaries to Residences l and <br /> 2, early morning / nighttime mining operations are not expected to exceed 45 dB Leq at those <br /> residences. However,due to the proximity of Residence 3 to the southeast corner of the site, early <br /> morning / nighttime mining activities near that southeast corner could cause exceedance of the <br /> recommended 45 dB Leq exterior noise Ievel standard at that location. As a result,additional noise <br /> mitigation measures are recommended for such operations. Table 3 indicates that,provided a 600 <br /> foot separation of the mining activities is maintained, exterior noise levels of approximately 45 dB <br /> Leq can be expected at Residence 3. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> This analysis concludes that,with some additional noise control measures,early morning/nighttime <br /> mining and processing operations at the DSS quarry site can occur without resulting in significant <br /> noise impacts at the nearest residences to this facility. The following specific measures are <br /> recommended to ensure compliance with applicable San Joaquin County noise standards and to <br /> reduce the potential for adverse public reaction to noise generated during early morning/nighttime <br /> mining and processing activities. <br /> I. Aggregate stockpiles locations should be maintained at their current positions' as those <br /> stockpiles provide partial shielding of processing area noise to the nearest residences to the <br /> east and south. <br /> 2. Early morning/nighttime mining activities within 600 feet ofany residence should not occur <br /> unless that equipment is recessed at least 40 feet within the pit so as to be substantially <br /> shielded from that residence. <br /> 3. Overburden removal or initial mining activities within 600 feet from existing residences for <br /> which the mining equipment is not recessed in the pit should be limited to hours during <br /> which operations currently occur. <br /> 4. In general,back-up beepers have frequently been cited as a source of annoyance at residential <br /> uses due to the tonal content of the beeping. As a result, front-loaders and other equipment <br /> which will operate at night should be retrofitted <br /> which routinely utilizes back-up beepers <br /> with either volume controls(set to the minimum levels required for safety), strobe lights,or <br /> radar-based back-up beepers. <br /> These conclusions and recommendations are based on the ambient noise level data collected in the <br /> project site vicinity for the original DSS quarry EIR,on current noise level data collected by Bollard <br /> & Brennan, Inc. at the DSS site, and on standard methodologies for .the prediction of sound <br /> propagation over distance. It should be noted that variations in atmospheric conditions (wind, <br /> temperature,humidity,etc.) will cause actual noise levels to be higher or lower than those predicted <br /> in this analysis. <br /> Environmental Noise Evaluation <br /> Proposed DSS Quarry Rescheduled Hours of Operation <br /> __ Page 6 �' <br />