My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002530
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAMMERS
>
26088
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-01-21
>
SU0002530
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:16 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:47:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002530
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-01-21
STREET_NUMBER
26088
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LAMMERS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
ENTERED_DATE
10/29/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26088 S LAMMERS RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\26088\SA-01-21\SU0002530\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\26088\SA-01-21\SU0002530\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\26088\SA-01-21\SU0002530\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LAMMERS\26088\SA-01-21\SU0002530\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chandler Martin <br /> December 9, 2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The City is also generally concerned about the compatibility of the proposed peaker <br /> plant with existing residential development. The location of this industrial use is <br /> incompatible with the City of Tracy General Plan, and the approved South Schulte <br /> Specific Plan, both of which establish policies for future residential growth for this area. <br /> In an effort to oppose approval of this application, City staff will be attending the San <br /> Joaquin County Planning Commission hearing to voice the concerns mentioned in this <br /> letter. <br /> We appreciate the opportunity to comment, but we do not see any justification for <br /> granting a time extension. This proposed project is not well thought out and has not <br /> been adequately analyzed. Our position is that the project's Site Approval should expire <br /> and that no further consideration should be given. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> 9vN d�-� <br /> Bill Reeds <br /> Director of Development and Engineering Services <br /> cc: Fred Diaz, City Manager <br /> Nick Pinhey, Director Of Public Works <br /> Bill Dean, Acting Planning Manager <br /> San Joaquin County Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.