My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004272 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LARCH
>
11515
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0300116
>
SU0004272 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:36 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:48:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0004272
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0300116
STREET_NUMBER
11515
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11515 W LARCH RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LARCH\11515\PA-0300116\SU0004272\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a° o SAN.JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> = z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> a � <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, 3rd Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> p Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> �/PORN <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: 11-1173 W lcr/ck f'V cK PA#. ,�)3 _ ��� <br /> REPORT DATE: / e211aCO-7— <br /> s = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ® ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical a,pd physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> rl <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass traport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for theproject ter N y, <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS ������ <br /> ®- ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, a serial fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any exis((Aor Ypotential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. N :�' <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater/at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development proje��0 � � �) <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> a ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contriuti n of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> 0 ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contsibu p pf nitrate load to the project site. <br /> (� ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of <br /> JJnitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future Ian-site solaces of ni rate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loadin�yeonsidering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading Qmisiila project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADIJJNG RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed projec(—ly ZAD <br /> FA ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site Z.c7j <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 5.1 The reportsigned, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> 22) <br /> ®' ❑ 5.2 The attach nts/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the repr_�LI) <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: u 0 <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.