Laserfiche WebLink
New Hope Soil Suitability <br /> • June 26,2008 <br /> File No.2836-001.01 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION <br /> • <br /> The locations of each percolation test site are shown on the attached Plate 2. As can be seen, <br /> there is one test hole on each proposed property; each hole is approximately 200 feet westerly of <br /> the easterly boundary of each property. Each percolation test hole was six inches in diameter <br /> and 36 inches deep. All holes were "scratched" with a wire brush to remove smeared surfaces. <br /> The bottom two inches of each test hole was covered with 3/8`h-inch pea gravel. The holes were <br /> • drilled by hand auger on March 25, 2008, and were pre-saturated at the time of drilling. Testing <br /> was performed on March 26 and again on March 27, as requested by the County. All holes were <br /> uniform and without significant sloughing and raveling following the pre-saturation and the two <br /> test intervals. The tests were performed by the placement of six inches of water over the pea <br /> • gravel, with the holes refilled as necessary during the testing. All tests were conducted for four <br /> hours with readings on one-half hour intervals. The final readings at each test site were observed <br /> by Lisa XA&ma of San Joaquin County. Copies of the actual field tests are attached as Plates 3 <br /> through 6,Perc Test Rate Form 1c. <br /> As discussed briefly above, it may be necessary to elevate leach fields slightly on the properties <br /> created by the proposed subdivision. Other than this, we would expect that conventional waste <br /> disposal systems to be appropriate. Although no percolation was measured for percolation test 5 <br /> (on Lot 5), because of the sizes of all of the proposed properties, we would expect with proper <br /> siting that appropriate permeability rates are obtainable. The size of the proposed properties (and <br /> their cost) like + Il ive rise to relatively large dwellings whose owners are able to design and <br /> e and effect <br /> ive waste disposal systems. <br /> .0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> The avera surface elevation at the site is on the order of 0 feet, USGS datum. In <br /> • addition, the Mokelumne River will form the westerly boundary of each proposed property. All <br /> the properties are below the 100 year flood level. Measured free groundwater levels were 7.50 <br /> and 5.75 feet below ground surface at the time of our late March 2008 testing, and we would <br /> expect significantly higher free groundwater levels during extended high stage conditions on the <br /> Mokelumne and/or during heavy irrigation' <br /> / f.� 7 <br /> y� KC Fnf- <br /> Percolation tests 2 (Lot 2), 3 (Lot 3), 4 (Lot 4), 5 (Lot 5) and 8 (Lot 8) resulted in percolation j <br /> rates slower than 60 minutes per inch. According to County standards, additional percolation d <br /> testing must be performed to find disposal locations with rates faster than 60 minutes per inch, or <br /> engineered alternate disposal systems must be used on these lots. <br /> Percolation tests 6 (Lot 6) and 7 (Lot 7) resulted in percolation rates of 60 minutes per inch, <br /> which are at the limit of what is allowed for non-engineered conventional septic disposal <br /> systems. With the results obtained on the other lots, we suggest engineered disposal systems <br /> also be considered for these lots. / <br /> ` As discussed above, elevating (mounding) of the disposal systems somewhat above the existing Y <br /> grades is warranted to provide clearance to groundwater levels. With proper choice and <br /> construction of disposal mounds, percolation rates also can be improved. We conclude that on- <br />