Laserfiche WebLink
` New Hope Soil Suitability <br /> April 3,2008 <br /> File No.2836-001.01 <br /> Page 2 <br /> ✓ 2.0 PRESENT AND PAST USES OF THE SITE <br /> The entire property, save for the residential use described above, is used for farming. As <br /> indicated, the northwesterly most approximately 30 acres of the property is a pear <br /> orchard. Portions of the property southerly of the pear orchard and along the Mokelumne <br /> are planted in grapes (approximately 160 acres). The easterly approximate 1500 feet of <br /> the property is planted in alfalfa (approximately 70 acres). Portions of the property <br /> which are now planted in alfalfa were planted in grapes less than one year ago. Other <br /> than the two residences and former TV and radio transmitter described in section 1.0, the <br /> use of the property is and always has been agricultural. <br /> Our firm prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property in 2006.1 <br /> The referenced report recommended screening and sampling around an approximate 500 <br /> gallon diesel tank located near the southerly residence. We performed the recommended <br /> screening and sampling in April 2006, and found that some samples contained diesel <br /> above laboratory reporting limits.2 We understand that the diesel tank was removed <br /> together with diesel-impacted soils in late 2007. In January 2008, we sampled and tested <br /> the cleanup site again and found some petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range at <br /> levels similar to those we determined in 2006. Based upon this, additional excavation <br /> and removal were performed while we were present on February 8, 2008. We obtained <br /> samples beyond the excavation limits on February 8th; the BTEX concentrations of the <br /> samples were found to be below the laboratory reporting limits. The results of the latter <br /> — <br /> finding were presented in a February 29, 2008 letter.3:• <br /> ✓3.0 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK USAGE <br /> Our referenced Phase I Environmental Site Assessment speculated that the two described <br /> on site residences were constructed in the early 1900's. This being the case, there is no <br /> record of the permitting of the sanitary system associated with either residence. We <br /> understand through Mike Stokes, the tenant farmer with a 20-year lease on the property <br /> (but not a resident of either dwelling), that he pumped both septic tanks three years ago, <br /> %P but to the best of his knowledge, neither tank was pumped before that time during his <br /> tenure on the property. Both systems are in ground (not mounded). We would estimate <br /> that both systems are at least 50 years old. We understand that the southerly residence <br /> segregates it waste and that there is grey water discharge to the ground surface associated <br /> with the washing machine. We understand that in ground septic tank and leach field <br /> IV <br /> Raney Geotechnical,Inc;"Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,West Lauffer Road Property,APNs <br /> 001-030-03 and 04,Thornton,California";February 16,2006;File No. 2836-001. <br /> Z Raney Geotechnical,Inc;"Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analyses,Vicinity of Above Ground Fuel Tank, <br /> APN 001-030-04,West Lauffer Road,Thornton,California";April 24,2006;File No.2836-001. <br /> 3 Raney Geotechnical,Inc;"Clearance Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analyses,Soil Removal Area, <br /> Vicinity of Former Above Ground Tank,APN 001-030-04,West Lauffer Road,Thornton,California"; <br /> February 29,2008;File No.2836-001. <br />