Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> r <br /> To : Planning Commission <br /> From: Thomas M. Gau <br /> Sub : MS-93-107 (Costamagna, et al) <br /> Date: 1-20-94 <br /> Page: -3 - <br /> PROJECT.DESCRIPTION: <br /> This is a Minor Subdivision of 64.6 acres to create two 20-acre homeskes and a 60.6-acre parcel. The <br /> General Pian designation for this site is AIG(General Agrkae),and the.zone is AGS. This site is not <br /> under Williamson Act Contract. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> On November 11, 1984, the Planning CommkWon approved Mkw S bion No. MS4%-17 to create <br /> an owner-operator homesite for Emie Castamagna. On November 7, 1985, the Planning Commission <br /> approved Minor Subdivision:Nm MS-86-8 to create an owner-opamW homosft.(APN 253320-16) for <br /> Ernie Costamagna and.John Pereira That application was a request for two owner-operator homeskes; <br /> however, only one homeske was approved On March 1, 1988, the Planning Division approved Minor <br /> Subdivision No.MS-89-41,which created an owner-operator homeelte fatMeredith Ruston and two family <br /> member homesltes for ArKkew H. RustanAnd Andrew M. RUWM(APN's 253420.19, 2% and 21), <br /> ISSUE: <br /> As noted in Findings No. 1 and 2,this appikmo n is InconsWent with this General Plant objective due to <br /> the creation of multiple homesites, resulting M the fragmentation of agricultural lands. Agricultural Policy <br /> No. 7 states that there shah he no further It of land designated for agricultural use with three <br /> exceptions. One exception under which this and other homeske subdivisions have been filed Is: <br /> 'Parcels for homesites:.mWibg crested, provided thatthegeneral Plan density Is not exceeded.@ <br /> The proposed subdivision,while consistent with Agricultural POW Not:T,Is not went with Objective <br /> No. 1 due to the fragmentation of agricultural land. In order to be approved, the project must be <br /> consistent with all pertin"General Place Oboctim and Policies. ; <br /> TGICM/blm <br /> Attachments <br />