Laserfiche WebLink
issuance of the building permit." The only environmental concerns observed on or near the <br /> subject property were the referenced three tires. Personal communication with Mr. Robert <br /> McClellan of EHD indicates that up to nine tires may be transported without needing a license to <br /> cavy more than nine. The tires can be taken to the Tracy Transfer Station on MacArthur Road. <br /> It is further recommended that a sign be placed near the north end of the property stating that <br /> people caught dumping trash will be prosecuted. <br /> Potential environmental impact from the USTs at the Traina home and the Tracy Rural Fire <br /> Department suggest that there is an extremely small likelihood of adverse impact to the subject <br /> parcels. It would be impossible to investigate environmental contamination at the Traina <br /> residence because the location of where the tank was buried(if at all) is not known. <br /> Asbestos containing materials (ACMs)testing from any portion of the existing residential <br /> structure is outside the scope of this investigation. If the home is ever demolished, it will be the <br /> responsibility of the demolition contractor or his representative to test for ACMs at that time. <br /> In addition, this homesite was not investigated for hazardous materials. Private homesites may <br /> contain lead paint, asbestos or hazardous materials that may or may not be typical. Typical <br /> household "hazardous materials" include pesticide sprays, gasoline, paint thinners, used motor oil, <br /> antifreeze, etc. The ASTM E-1527-00 Document referenced above refers to de minimus <br /> environmental conditions. De minimus conditions generally do not present a material risk to <br /> public health or to the environment and generally would not include an enforcement action if <br /> observed by the appropriate governmental agencies. Household hazardous materials may be z. <br /> considered de minimus concems if there has been no spillage or dumping,which were not <br /> observed. This also applies to the on-site septic system that serves the residential stmctur . It is <br /> common knowledge that the subsoils have excellent percolation in the underlying gravel strata. <br /> The EHD no longer allows the installation of sumps or pits in this area due to the nitrate problem <br /> in the groundwater. <br /> As documented in several Surface and Subsurface Contamination Reports done for other projects <br /> in San Joaquin County, the surface and subsurface soils that currently compose the project will <br /> undergo significant changes during the initial phases of project development. This fact was also <br /> discussed in our 1999 SSCR for the Castello Estates project. Earthwork at the Castello Estates <br /> project presently undergoing development illustrate the dramatic changes from the original "in- <br /> place" surface soils. The soil cuts and fills are substantial. In the street areas, the cuts are <br /> approximately three feet with the pads built up two feet. <br /> Therefore it is our opinion that prel'! ry camaline and analysis for adverse constituents in the <br /> soil are not warranted due to these ic chanaes�inthe soils that will oc in <br /> mento e Additionally, soil chemistry alterations caused by environmental <br /> factors including increases in ultraviolet light exposure, moisture content,aeration, all lead to a <br /> 8 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />