Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 3 <br /> PC: 9-17-92 <br /> UP-92-25 <br /> Page 10 <br /> REFERRALS AND REPLIES <br /> The application referrals were mailed on July 29, 1992, with responses due by August 20, 1992. <br /> Department of Public Works (response: 8-19-92): <br /> See 'Conditions of Approval.' <br /> Environmental Health Division (response: 8-4-92): <br /> See 'Conditions of Approval.' <br /> Building Inspection Division (response: 8-6-92): <br /> See 'Conditions of Approval.' <br /> Stockton Fire Department (response: 8-1492): <br /> See 'Conditions of Approval.' <br /> Air Pollution Control District (response: 83-92): <br /> APCD indicated that the project is exempt from their requirements. <br /> Council of Governments (response: 8-21-92): <br /> The Council staff indicated that this project is outside of the high noise contours but that extra <br /> soundproofing to the structure might be added to protea the project from the noise of occasional <br /> overflights. The Council staff also recommended methods to discourage water fowl from using the <br /> retention pond. <br /> As of August 27, 1992, no responses were received from the following: <br /> Pacific Gas & Electric City of Stockton <br /> Lodi Unified School District Bear Creek Resource Conservation District <br /> Woodbridge Irrigation District Caftrans <br /> San Joaquin County Mosquito Abatement District State Department of Fish and Game <br /> Lincoln Fire Department <br /> APPLICATION DATA <br /> A legal ad for the public hearing was published in the Stockton Record on 9-10-92. <br /> No. of public hearing notices mailed: 18. Date: 9-4-92 <br /> �' The staff report was prepared by Steven St. Sure. <br />