SU0002973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY r. ? COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT a: .a • 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE.,STOCKTON,CA 95205.6232 c4�iFOae+`P PHONE:2091468-3121 Fax:209/468-3163 June 25, 1996 Board of Supervisors Courthouse Stockton, CA 95202 Dear Board Members: GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. GP-96-1 AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZR-96-1 OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. (FOURTH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT) IT IS RECOMMENDED: That the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve the Negative Declaration; 2. Adopt a motion of intent to approve General Plan Map Amendment No. GP-96-1 based on the "Basis for General Plan Map Amendment" (Attachment A); and 3. Adopt a motion of intent to approve Zone Reclassification No. ZR-96-1 based on the "Bases for Zone Reclassification" (Attachment B). REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: This project is a General Plan Map Amendment from I/L(Limited Industrial) to I/G (General Industrial) and a Zone Reclassification from I-L (Limited Industrial) to I-G (General Industrial) for a 27.9 acre site. The underlying project is a Site Approval Application (SA-96-17) for expansion of an existing pipe manufacturing facility by adding outdoor manufacturing of prestressed concrete piles. The project site is already fully developed with industrial uses and no expansion of the land area is proposed. This site is in the enterprize zone. This proposal is consistent with the General Plan's objectives and policies for General Industrial development. This site is served by public wells. However, this site is not currently served by public sewage disposal and storm drainage. However, those services are in close proximity to this site. As a part of the Site Approval review, it will be determined if it is appropriate to hook up or allow the facilities to continue with on site sewage disposal and storm drainage. A letter from an adjacent resident expressed concerns regarding noise. The Development Title includes performance standards and screening requirements which address noise generated by industrial uses. The noise issue will be addressed during review of the underlying project. The Planning Commission heard this matter at its regularly scheduled meeting of June 13, 1996. At the meeting, Cy Thomson spoke in favor of the project. No one spoke in opposition. After considering all written and oral testimony, the Commission voted 6-0 to make the above-listed recommendation.